Search for: "LLJ v. State"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2010, 5:18 am
The Court of Appeal (Sedley, Smith LLJ) had, in a single judgment of the Court [...] [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 11:46 am
Sutton v Norwich (2021) EWCA Civ 20, on appeal from the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) (2020) UKUT 0090 (LC), 20th March 2020. [read post]
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
Does this mean, as ruled in the Physical Research Laboratory v K.G. [read post]
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
Does this mean, as ruled in the Physical Research Laboratory v K.G. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 2:46 am
As demonstrated by Mamatkulov v Turkey (2005) 41 EHRR 25, DFAL’s criterion of serious irreversible harm shows some intersection with the ECtHR’s application of rule 39 relief. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 3:45 am
It raises important and fundamental questions concerning the conduct of inquests, and will be of particular significance to bereaved families where the deceased is alleged to have committed suicide while in the care or custody of the state. [read post]
22 May 2009, 3:05 am
Smith and Wall LLJ agreed with Pill LJ. [read post]
15 May 2013, 10:47 am
By way of contrast with the treatment of this issue in the United States, Norman takes a look at a very recent decision of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 451 (Kitchin, Richards and Lewison LLJ var’g [2012] EWHC 1789 (Pat) Floyd J). [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:31 pm
When such appointments are made in the United States the judicial record of the appointee is subject to minute analysis over many months. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:31 pm
Reserved Judgments George v Cannell, heard on 14 June 2022 (Underhill V-P, Warby and Snowden LLJ) The Duke of Sussex v Associated Newspaper [read post]
22 May 2012, 4:28 pm
Burnton LJ does not explicitly engage with the reputation argument but states he agrees the judgment of Elias LJ who does. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
On 22 November 2023, the Court of Appeal (Bean, Andrew and Lewis LLJ) handed down judgment in Department for Business and Trade v Information Commissioner [2023] EWCA Civ 1378. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 8:34 am
On this point Newham relied on Ryan v Islington. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 11:13 am
” The review decision barely dealt with this, stating: “140. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am
The roadmap expressly states it is not a guide to future compliance, but rather an information document setting out Ofcom’s present thinking. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:22 am
Europe The European Data Protection Board published an opinion on data transfers between EU member states and Russia. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm
The High Court has ruled that security and intelligence services must obtain “prior independent authorisation” to access individuals’ communication data from telecommunications companies (Liberty v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] EWHC 1630 (Admin)). [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm
United States Last week, President Biden established the White House Task Force to Address Online Harassment and Abuse, which appears will be focusing particularly on online harms which “disproportionately affect women, girls, people of colour and LGBTQI+ individuals” with “technology-facilitated gender-based violence” its top priority. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am
On the same day Collins J gave judgment in the case of Dew v Mills Nanyn . [read post]
