Search for: "LONG v. TALLEY" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2010, 2:02 pm by Eric Talley
 As per Gordon’s earlier post, I like the Dodge v. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 6:05 am
”He got slammed by — well, Dowd doesn't say who:It didn’t take long for the guillotine to fall. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
Briefly: In an article published by the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, SCOTUSblog Books Editor Ronald Collins examines the Supreme Court’s recent decision on robocalls in Barr v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 4:14 pm by Eric Talley
For example, Delaware’s Chancery Court has recently approved the maintenance of a dilutive shareholder rights plan triggered at an ownership threshold of 4.99% (see Selecteca v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 1:30 pm by Andrew F. Sellars
To force identification of the originator of a comment "upon request" without any limitation is just the Talley v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 1:30 pm by Andrew F. Sellars
To force identification of the originator of a comment "upon request" without any limitation is just the Talley v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:56 am by Kiran Bhat
Yesterday the Court granted cert. in Chafin v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 8:10 pm
For the reasons set forth below, and because we conclude that there is a material dispute of fact about whether Talley abandoned her job or was discharged, we AFFIRM in part, REVERSE in part, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 08a0345p.062008/09/11 Rosella Hunt v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 6:08 am
Robert Brown, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, on Friday, March 12, 2021 Tags: Accountability, Accounting, Accounting standards, Audits, Bebchuk v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 2:35 pm by Ben Sperry
District Court for the Northern District of Indiana detailed the Supreme Court’s precedents on anonymous speech: In Talley v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 4:21 pm
Talley, 431 F.3d 784, 788 (11th Cir. 2005), and that “relevant uncharged or acquitted conduct may be taken into account in sentencing, as long as such conduct is proven by a preponderance of the evidence and the court clearly applied the Guidelines as advisory. [read post]