Search for: "LOPEZ v. US "
Results 1 - 20
of 1,242
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2023, 10:58 am
The post ULISES LOPEZ v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 2:49 am
The Center for Immigration Law and Policy has filed an amicus brief in the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 11:23 am
USA v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:51 pm
Lopez consented by responding 'yes.' [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 6:27 am
Lopez v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 6:59 am
Before us, Gomez raises questions related to the impeachment ... [read post]
30 May 2023, 2:42 am
Carrillo-Lopez that 8 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:19 pm
" Gibbons v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
The Supreme Court's ruling in Royston v Lopez sends a message encouraging Texas lawyers and lawfirms to do just that. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 2:13 am
US v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 9:23 am
Last week the US Supreme Court issued its decision in New York Board of Elections v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 5:28 pm
He did so to make it seem to the jury as if Lopez–Avila had lied under oath about being threatened to commit the cocaine possession crime, when she had plainly responded to a magistrate judge's question about whether she had been threatened to enter a plea of guilty. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 10:24 am
Eduardo Lopez-Velasquez gets deported in 1994 at a group proceeding in which he wasn't advised of the potential availability of discretionary relief from deportation. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 7:15 am
In Patrick v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 3:39 am
US v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 8:09 am
The case is titled Jennifer Lopez, et al. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 3:26 pm
A pretty good panel gives us a pretty disappointing decision, in United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 6:09 am
(filed Aug. 2, 2021) (Rodgers I) in light of the Court’s decision in Lopez-Villa v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 3:00 am
Navarro-Lopez, No. 04-70345 (9-19-07) (en banc). [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:12 pm
Virtually identical to the two cases here is the high court's unanimous decision in Knowles v. [read post]
