Search for: "LYLES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" Results 61 - 80 of 100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2012, 7:12 am by Rachel Sachs
The ACLU praised last week’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and others highlight the amicus brief the Institute has filed in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:20 pm by Eugene Kontorovich
The great object [of the statute]… was to protect the merchant vessels of the United States and their crews from piratical aggressions. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am by John Elwood
  It may be destined for a simple grant, vacate, and remand, but, as Lyle reported yesterday, counsel for the schoo [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
” Commentary comes from Ken Jost at Jost on Justice, who observes that jurors “may bring other kinds of bias into the jury room, but those cases are no reason to back away from one limited safeguard against the racial discrimination that still pervades criminal justice in the United States,” and from Mark Joseph Stern in Slate, who asks how, if Chief Justice John Roberts does not recognize the pernicious effects of racial bias in this case, Roberts can “ever… [read post]
3 May 2013, 6:11 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry (the challenge to Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:00 am by Kali Borkoski
Patchak (Granted )Docket: 11-246Issue(s): (1) Whether the Quiet Title Act and its reservation of the United States' sovereign immunity in suits involving "trust or restricted Indian lands" apply to all suits concerning land in which the United States "claims an interest," 28 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am by John Elwood
Wong, 13-1074, and United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
” At Constitution Daily, Lyle Denniston reports that the court could announce this morning whether it will review Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 3:07 am by Lyle Denniston
   They lost in the Supreme Court in a 5-to-4 decision in 1973 (Gilligan v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 6:13 am
United States, and American Needle v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices held 5-4 that the government ordinarily needs a warrant to access historical cell-site location information. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:21 am by Conor McEvily
  And Lyle Denniston of this blog, Jennie Ryan at JURIST, and Debra Cassens Weiss of the ABA Journal all provide coverage of Louisiana v. [read post]