Search for: "Labor Board v. Drivers Local Union"
Results 1 - 20
of 75
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2023, 3:25 pm
The Union then filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”) alleging unfair labor practices for retaliating against truck drivers for engaging in a protected strike. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 9:02 am
The US Supreme Court held Thursday that a local union must litigate a property damage dispute in state court, as opposed to appearing before the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 8:55 am
The case centers around property damage Glacier, a concrete business, suffered during a strike led by drivers who are represented by Teamsters Local 174 (the “Union”) after contract negotiations had broken down. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:56 am
The brief filed on appeal on behalf of Teamsters Union Local 456 adds the following:Ricci was a truck driver member of . . . [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 2:36 pm
Teamsters Union Local 456, 781 F.3d 25 (2d Cir. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 9:59 am
At issue in Glacier Northwest v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:29 am
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 174, many labor advocates and labor law experts were steeling themselves for a broad rollback of workers’ right to strike. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 9:11 am
Teamsters Local 89 (the “Union”) represents the drivers from these other two trucking companies at the Louisville terminal and started trying to organize Quickway’s drivers there in June 2019. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:52 am
There, the company’s truck drivers are members of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No. 174. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:52 am
There, the company’s truck drivers are members of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No. 174. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 5:38 am
Weigand v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 7:00 am
Weigand v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:41 pm
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No. 174 – began over five years ago when the Union in Washington State representing the Employer’s truck drivers went on strike. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 2:12 pm
Truck Drivers Union Local No. 413 v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 3:02 pm
Attempts at legislative reform are also well underway—the “Save Local Business Act,” which would amend the National Labor Relations Act and the Fair Labor Standards Act to limit joint employer liability, currently has bipartisan support in the U.S. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 3:02 pm
Attempts at legislative reform are also well underway—the “Save Local Business Act,” which would amend the National Labor Relations Act and the Fair Labor Standards Act to limit joint employer liability, currently has bipartisan support in the U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:55 am
Maryland v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 7:27 am
A recent decision by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) addressed an employee’s claim that a labor union breached this duty by discriminating against her on the basis of sex. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 3:55 pm
UberX and UberBLACK Drivers Are Not Employees for Purposes of the NLRA According to the NLRB General Counsel’s Division of Advice (GC), Uber’s UberX and UberBLACK drivers are independent contractors exempt from the rights and protections of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), including the right to form and join unions. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:31 am
For Glacier’s truck drivers, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No. 174 is the exclusive bargaining representative. [read post]
