Search for: "Labor Board v. Truck Drivers Union"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2015, 4:56 am
The brief filed on appeal on behalf of Teamsters Union Local 456 adds the following:Ricci was a truck driver member of . . . [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 3:02 pm
Sanitary Truck Drivers, 362 NLRB No. 186 (2015) In Browning-Ferris, the Board voted 3-2 to “revisit and revise” its joint employer standard, holding that Browning-Ferris Industries (“BFI”) was a joint employer of workers provided by Leadpoint, an outside staffing agency, at a BFI recycling plant. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 3:02 pm
Sanitary Truck Drivers, 362 NLRB No. 186 (2015) In Browning-Ferris, the Board voted 3-2 to “revisit and revise” its joint employer standard, holding that Browning-Ferris Industries (“BFI”) was a joint employer of workers provided by Leadpoint, an outside staffing agency, at a BFI recycling plant. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 7:27 am
The charging party in ILA has been a member of the union since 2001, usually working as a truck driver. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 6:40 am
Plus, the court noted that, appropriately, the Board did not give controlling weight to the fact that the union had already organized the drivers. [read post]
23 May 2018, 10:56 am
On May 9, 2018, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) announced it is considering rulemaking to address the standard for determining joint-employer status under the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”). [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 12:16 pm
Sanitary Truck Drivers, 362 NLRB No. 186. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 8:00 pm
However, recent court and labor board decisions indicate that the traditional definition of “employee” continues to expand. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 7:06 am
The Board erred when, focusing on the fact that several dozen drivers were ultimately moved to a bargaining unit where they were paid significantly less, it ruled that the company had impermissibly changed the scope of the bargaining unit (Aggregate Industries v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 6:18 am
The court denied the employer’s petition for review and granted the Board’s cross-application for enforcement of its decision finding that the company’s refusal to reinstate the striking workers was an unfair labor practice (Spurlino Materials, LLC v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 6:52 am
” Moreover, the Board properly applied the doctrine in finding an employer unlawfully refused to bargain with the union that represented a group of truck drivers once it took over their bankrupt employer’s operations. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 7:17 am
Celadon Trucking Services, Inc.). [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 2:12 pm
http://www.nlrb.gov/shared_files/Board%20Decisions/350/v35074.htm The Board adopted the administrative law judge's findings that Respondent violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act by taking the following unilateral actions without giving the Union notice and an opportunity to bargain: (i) assigning a new store account to a bargaining unit driver's delivery route; (ii) reassigning a store vacated by a… [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
FMCSA considering loosening hours-of-service restrictions for commercial truck drivers. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am
” Labor law cases Kavanaugh has written a number of opinions reviewing National Labor Relations Board decisions; in many of these cases, he voted to reverse the board. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
Instead, he concluded that the Respondent's unilateral action was unlawful because the Respondent hired a workforce consisting solely of its predecessor's Union-represented employees and that the Respondent was a "perfectly clear" successor within the meaning of NLRB v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
UberBLACK limo drivers aren’t. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 8:09 am
NLRB v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 2:35 pm
There, the truck driver testified that, “after dropping off a trailer [at the last delivery point], he considered the day’s work over. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 2:35 pm
There, the truck driver testified that, “after dropping off a trailer [at the last delivery point], he considered the day’s work over. [read post]
