Search for: "Labor Board v. Truck Drivers Union"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2015, 10:06 am
As a result, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) was created to enforce those rights. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:56 am
The brief filed on appeal on behalf of Teamsters Union Local 456 adds the following:Ricci was a truck driver member of . . . [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 3:02 pm
Sanitary Truck Drivers, 362 NLRB No. 186 (2015) In Browning-Ferris, the Board voted 3-2 to “revisit and revise” its joint employer standard, holding that Browning-Ferris Industries (“BFI”) was a joint employer of workers provided by Leadpoint, an outside staffing agency, at a BFI recycling plant. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 3:02 pm
Sanitary Truck Drivers, 362 NLRB No. 186 (2015) In Browning-Ferris, the Board voted 3-2 to “revisit and revise” its joint employer standard, holding that Browning-Ferris Industries (“BFI”) was a joint employer of workers provided by Leadpoint, an outside staffing agency, at a BFI recycling plant. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 7:27 am
The charging party in ILA has been a member of the union since 2001, usually working as a truck driver. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 6:40 am
Plus, the court noted that, appropriately, the Board did not give controlling weight to the fact that the union had already organized the drivers. [read post]
23 May 2018, 10:56 am
On May 9, 2018, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) announced it is considering rulemaking to address the standard for determining joint-employer status under the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”). [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 12:16 pm
Sanitary Truck Drivers, 362 NLRB No. 186. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 8:00 pm
However, recent court and labor board decisions indicate that the traditional definition of “employee” continues to expand. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 7:06 am
The Board erred when, focusing on the fact that several dozen drivers were ultimately moved to a bargaining unit where they were paid significantly less, it ruled that the company had impermissibly changed the scope of the bargaining unit (Aggregate Industries v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 6:18 am
The court denied the employer’s petition for review and granted the Board’s cross-application for enforcement of its decision finding that the company’s refusal to reinstate the striking workers was an unfair labor practice (Spurlino Materials, LLC v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 6:52 am
” Moreover, the Board properly applied the doctrine in finding an employer unlawfully refused to bargain with the union that represented a group of truck drivers once it took over their bankrupt employer’s operations. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 7:17 am
Celadon Trucking Services, Inc.). [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
FMCSA considering loosening hours-of-service restrictions for commercial truck drivers. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am
” Labor law cases Kavanaugh has written a number of opinions reviewing National Labor Relations Board decisions; in many of these cases, he voted to reverse the board. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
UberBLACK limo drivers aren’t. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 10:24 am
General Drivers, et al.Court: U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 11-10120 October 5, 2011 Judge: Prado Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Labor & Employment Law This case involved a claim brought under 42 U.S.C. 1981 by a terminated employee against his former union, which represented him in a grievance hearing in connection with his termination. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
But the driver “chose” to detach the truck from the trailer and drive himself to safety, which “he thought wise but his employer did not. [read post]
18 May 2020, 9:00 pm
City of Union City, Ga. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 9:55 pm
In 2018, the California Supreme Court gave its judgement in the case of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
