Search for: "Ladd v. Ladd" Results 41 - 60 of 80
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2011, 1:50 pm by NL
Windsor and District Housing Association v Hewitt [2011] EWCA Civ 1096 (Not on Bailii or elsewhere. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 4:04 am by NL
Bank of Scotland v Pereira & Pain & Pain [2011] EWCA Civ 241 This is a rather odd one. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 4:04 am by NL
Bank of Scotland v Pereira & Pain & Pain [2011] EWCA Civ 241 This is a rather odd one. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:24 pm by NL
The appellant argued that the expert's recent report constituted new evidence that would satisfy the test for new evidence post-judgement set out in Ladd v Marshall [1954] 1 WLR 1489, in that: i) the evidence could not have been obtained with reasonable diligence for use at trial ii) the evidence would probably have an important influence on the result of the case iii) the evidence was credible (though it need not be incontrovertible). [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:24 pm by NL
The appellant argued that the expert's recent report constituted new evidence that would satisfy the test for new evidence post-judgement set out in Ladd v Marshall [1954] 1 WLR 1489, in that: i) the evidence could not have been obtained with reasonable diligence for use at trial ii) the evidence would probably have an important influence on the result of the case iii) the evidence was credible (though it need not be incontrovertible). [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 2:35 pm by Kurt J. Schafers
Soc., 196 F.R.D. 254, 256 (M.D.Pa. 2000) (holding that documents prepared by expert witnesses, including draft expert reports, are not protected by the work product doctrine); Ladd Furniture, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 7:46 am by Daniel Schwartz
The Standard of Review in ERISA Benefit Denials: Metropolitan v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 8:04 am
Rosenberg and his fellow Membership First plaintiffs 1st VP Anne-Marie-Johnson and board members Diane Ladd and Kent McCord might see some reason to continue the charade, but the Court of Appeal is apparently more skeptical: in a one-paragraph letter to counsel last week, the court asked both sides’ lawyers to be prepared to discuss at oral argument whether the appeal is moot, given that the SAG board reaffirmed Allen’s dismissal and White’s appointment, and the membership… [read post]