Search for: "Lady v. State Bar" Results 1 - 20 of 356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2019, 6:34 am by UKSC Blog
The onus has shifted to the state to justify an interference with a right. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 3:37 pm by Kevin
The specific case I'm thinking of (in case there are more than one) is Conrad v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am by INFORRM
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
Background Last week the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 2:51 am by Jonathan Glasson QC, Matrix.
The post Case Comment:Torfaen County Borough Council v Douglas Willis Ltd [2013] UKSC 59 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 4:47 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
 The appellant made fresh submissions to the Secretary of State in 2011, claiming that she had been working in a nail bar. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:14 am by Laura Sandwell
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am by Kirsten Sjvoll, Matrix Chambers
Comment This case is significant for two reasons: First, it tasks the Supreme Court with answering the question raised obiter by Lady Hale in Savage v South Essex NHS Trust [2009] 1 AC 653, namely “what is the extent of the state’s duty to protect all people against an immediate risk of self-harm? [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 4:16 am
He was 49 and President of the United States. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am by Daniel West
By a slim 4:3 majority (Lady Hale and Lords Phillips and Kerr dissenting), the Court upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal by finding that the claims of the servicemen should not be allowed to proceed on the basis that they were time-barred. [read post]