Search for: "Lady v. State Bar"
Results 1 - 20
of 344
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2020, 9:36 am
In Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 6:19 am
In Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 6:34 am
The onus has shifted to the state to justify an interference with a right. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 3:37 pm
The specific case I'm thinking of (in case there are more than one) is Conrad v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:10 am
In Church of Christ in Hollywood v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
23 May 2017, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Our Lady's Inn v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 1:31 am
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:32 am
Background Last week the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 2:51 am
The post Case Comment:Torfaen County Borough Council v Douglas Willis Ltd [2013] UKSC 59 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 8:20 pm
In Anderson, two men met two ladies at a bar during a night of drinking. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 4:47 am
The appellant made fresh submissions to the Secretary of State in 2011, claiming that she had been working in a nail bar. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:37 am
ahin v Turkey (2005) 44 EHRR 99, para 152). [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 9:44 am
” Some of those questions were answered in Our Lady of Guadalupe v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 6:00 am
" The court said that in its reaching that conclusion it expressed "no view on whether any of the Diocese's defenses are meritorious" and "the order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and matter remitted to that Court with direction to remand to DHR for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion".* The Court of Appeals' decision noted the "ministerial exception is a doctrine grounded in the First Amendment to the Constitution of… [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 6:00 am
" The court said that in its reaching that conclusion it expressed "no view on whether any of the Diocese's defenses are meritorious" and "the order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and matter remitted to that Court with direction to remand to DHR for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion".* The Court of Appeals' decision noted the "ministerial exception is a doctrine grounded in the First Amendment to the Constitution of… [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:14 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am
Comment This case is significant for two reasons: First, it tasks the Supreme Court with answering the question raised obiter by Lady Hale in Savage v South Essex NHS Trust [2009] 1 AC 653, namely “what is the extent of the state’s duty to protect all people against an immediate risk of self-harm? [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
By a slim 4:3 majority (Lady Hale and Lords Phillips and Kerr dissenting), the Court upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal by finding that the claims of the servicemen should not be allowed to proceed on the basis that they were time-barred. [read post]
