Search for: "Laing v. Federal Express Corp."
Results 221 - 240
of 251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Jan. 28, 20090)(Unpub)Affirming dismissal of fem sales manager's dual retaliation claimsCommentary on previously reported Federal Appellate Court decisions>> 5th Cir. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
(Patents4Life) Role of Washington DC District Court in patent cases (Patently-O) Did you know... the prevailing party in a section 337 investigation is not automatically a party on appeal at the Federal Circuit? [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm
Payment-Card Financial Institution (Issuing Bank and Acquiring Bank) Cases Visa, MasterCard, American Express and other payment card companies hav [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
In Barrick Gold Corp. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
When an additional $750,000 was needed, Carlson expressed concern that Gibson was running a scam. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:50 pm
Retail Credit Corp., 521 F.2d 1079 (4th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1087 (1976). [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Mar. 17, 2009)Black administrator did not suffer an adverse action in his claim that he was denied an award nomination because of race discrimNoted here: FedSmithCommentary on previously reported Federal Appellate Court decisions2nd Cir.Courts Can Increase Employment Law Jury Awards to Offset Adverse Tax Consequences of Lump Sum PaymentEshelman v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 4:06 am
District Court finds no race/gender harassment + retaliation in a case involving Black federal co-workers; noted here> FILED · Fem Transgender Air Marshal Files Lawsuit vs DHS etc · Black ex-fibby sues FBI second time for retaliation> NEWS · [5-8] GW Faculty Senate votes to include gender identity and expression in non-discrim policyFL> FILED · [5-11] Legal secy sues FL… [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am
Hart v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (Class 46) Global - Patents Valuing patents: discussion on Malte Kollner’s Intellectual Asset Management Magazine article ‘The journey is the reward’: (IP finance), Indigenous groups express concern on IP protection of their knowledge: (Intellectual Property Watch), Eco-patent commons – what’s going on? [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
There is no expressive element deserving copyright protection in each listing. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
http://j.st/qXj Northeast Hospital Corp. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
”[25] Others have declined to impose sanctions for noncompliance, at least where the recipient is found to be acting in good faith, expressing “considerable discomfort to think that a court of law should order a violation of law, particularly on the territory of the sovereign whose law is in question. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
: Industries Ltd v Dynamic Supply Pty Ltd: (IP Down Under)BrazilIFPI raids hundreds of internet cafes: 600 cops, one arrest: (Ars Technica)CanadaInterlocutory injunctions in trade mark cases: a difficult test to meet: CMAC Mortgages v Canadian Mortgage Expert Centre and CanadaHyundai Autov Cross Canada Auto Body Supply: (Canadian Trademark Blog), (coverage of Hyundia - IPblog), Privacy Coalition warns on copyright reform: (Michael Geist),Wikinomics on… [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
” In their decision in Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 2:12 pm
Can-Am Plumbing v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
Plunges nationwide in real estate values in cities like Detroit and Las Vegas attest to this fact. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am
Illinois Department of Revenue (1967) and Quill Corp. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
