Search for: "Lambert v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 600
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2023, 11:00 pm
It also found it telling that there was no proof of any amendment(s) filed with the state changing the business’s principal place of business to Nassau.And while there is a preference that cases be brought in the county where the accident occurred, absent a showing of any inconvenience to the witnesses, the AD1 thought the case should remain where it was originally brought.Everything sure has its place ….# # #DECISIONM v Lampert [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Press, Dec. 2017).Mary Ziegler, Beyond Abortion: Roe v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:49 am
PatentsKat Neil reflects on the lexical transformation of the “troll” from stock character in Scandinavian mythology (and plastic dolls with bright colored up-combed hair...) into a staple of contemporary IP discourse, not once but twice: The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling"Kat Troll DollIPKat provided further depth commentary on Warner-Lambert v Actavis, delving… [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:47 pm
[cites omitted] However, in light of our supreme court's rationale in Lambert v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 11:14 pm by John Collins
On 14 November 2018, the UK Supreme Court handed down its judgment in Warner-Lambert Company LLC (Appellant) v Generics (UK) Ltd t/a Mylan and another (Respondents) [2018] UKSC 56. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 9:01 pm
At 11 a.m., the Court is scheduled to hear argument in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:43 pm by Bexis
Warner Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2006), aff’d by equally divided court, 552 U.S. 440 (2008), attempting to distinguish Buckman Co. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:37 am by Colter Paulson
  The Supreme Court accepted cert in Desinao, but issued only a 4-4 split decision in Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
.* Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 4: harmony between parties in ‘lyrical’ patent disputeLast Thursday, Jeremy reported a High Court Order obtained by Warner-Lambert (part of the Pfizer group) mandating the NHS to release guidance about the prescribing of pregabalin (Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group PTC EHF & Others[2015] EWHC 485 (Pat) (02 March 2015)) [on which see the IPKat earlier posts, here and here]. [read post]