Search for: "Lamberth v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 83
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2017, 6:02 pm
City of San Antonio Fire Department, March 6, 2017, Lamberth, R.). [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 7:32 am
Security Council passed a resolution condemning Israeli settlements with the United States abstaining. [read post]
Case o' The Week: Forfeiture hits a new Lo -- United States v. Henry Lo, Forfeiture, and Restitution
10 Oct 2016, 9:58 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 9:13 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:18 am
As the Court later explained in Baker v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 9:46 am
Slahi presents no threat to the United States or any other country, and his continued detention is unjustified. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 1:27 pm
Prosecutors are calling upon a state law put in place by voters in 2000 that has not been used until now. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 1:27 pm
Prosecutors are calling upon a state law put in place by voters in 2000 that has not been used until now. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 6:15 am
The case, formally known as Rubin et al v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm
Petitioners argued that Chief Judge Lamberth was correct in finding that (1) the deferential Turner v. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 7:03 pm
” Additionally, Levine relies heavily on United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
Baloco v. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 11:19 pm
Maynard — and then suggested by the concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 6:27 am
I leave it to you to assess whether Judge Lamberth's obvious frustration was justified and I'm interested in your thoughts. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 12:57 pm
I believe that the detainees ended their hunger strike mainly because the warden, Army Col John V. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 2:25 pm
On Monday morning, a significant Guantanamo case, Hatim v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:35 am
Myers II, Chief Judge Royce Lamberth of the U.S. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 10:32 am
In United Space Alliance, LLC v Solis (94 EPD ¶44,325), Judge Lamberth ruled against the contractor’s attempt to seek relief from an April 11, 2011, order of the DOL’s Administrative Review Board adopting an earlier Administrative Law Judge order requiring the contractor to submit to the OFCCP additional data for analyses beyond that which the contractor had submitted in response Paragraph #11 of the “Itemized Listing. [read post]
5 Oct 2013, 7:00 am
Obama, which Judge Lamberth promptly did. [read post]
