Search for: "Lambeth v. Lambeth"
Results 101 - 120
of 278
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
Per Blackburn-Smith v Lambeth London Borough Council [2007] EWHC 767 (Admin) and Dobbs J:” the defendant’s powers were never intended to enable it to act as an alternative welfare agency in circumstances where Parliament had determined that the claimant should be excluded from mainstream benefits;…”The High Court agreed with Barking.Section 17 (1) gives a clear indication of the purposes for which the powers in that part of the Children Act should… [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 10:35 am
Quoting Munby J (as he was) in R(B) v Lambeth LBC [2006] EWHC 639 (Admin)“1. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 10:35 am
Quoting Munby J (as he was) in R(B) v Lambeth LBC [2006] EWHC 639 (Admin)“1. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 7:38 am
ii) Second, having referred to Al Ameri v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC [2004] 2 AC 159, the judge concluded that, on the facts, the Appellant had not chosen to live in Lambeth. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 7:38 am
ii) Second, having referred to Al Ameri v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC [2004] 2 AC 159, the judge concluded that, on the facts, the Appellant had not chosen to live in Lambeth. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 1:27 pm
The Appeals Court said, "Having reviewed the dismissal de novo, assuming that the facts stated in the complaint are true, Lambeth v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:16 am
In Stewart v Lambeth LBC [2012] EWCA Civ 753, the applicant became homeless after he was evicted for rent arrears. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:16 am
In Stewart v Lambeth LBC [2012] EWCA Civ 753, the applicant became homeless after he was evicted for rent arrears. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 4:46 pm
All right -- normally I do not engage laypersons who are ignorant of the law, but in this case (because so many people are being misled), I shall make an exception to that policy. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 1:12 pm
Henson v Blackwood & Blackwood. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 1:12 pm
Henson v Blackwood & Blackwood. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:42 am
The result of this confusion is that LGBT's see themselves as "victims", and people like V. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm
Lambeth LBC v Kay [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 A.C. 465; [2006] H.L.R. 22, per Lord Nichols [61] and Lord Hope [64]. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm
Lambeth LBC v Kay [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 A.C. 465; [2006] H.L.R. 22, per Lord Nichols [61] and Lord Hope [64]. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm
The case of McLaughlin v London Borough of Lambeth was settled just before the commencement of a 20 day trial by Eady J. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 5:01 am
So the LL has a discretion as to whether to proceed further.The other case the Court in Stafford considered was Forbes v Lambeth London Borough Council[2003] EWHC 222 (QB). [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 11:21 pm
She relied by analogy on the decision of the House in Kay v Lambeth London Borough Council [2006] UKHL 10, [2006] 2 AC 465, where the House considered the article 8 right to respect for the home. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am
Last week’s resolved cases include: Mr John Donovan v Metro, Clause 1, 21/05/2012; Lesley Archer v The Echo (Southend), Clause 1, 18/05/2012; Ms Nicola Searle v South Wales Echo, Clauses 1, 3, 17/05/2012; Mr Liam Fairlie v North Devon Journal, Clause 1, 17/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v Northampton Chronicle & Echo, Clause 1, 17/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v The Sun, Clause 1, 17/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v Daily Mirror, Clause 1,… [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:02 pm
However, RBK&C maintained that such a breach could be averted by Mr De A’s return to Portugal, where he would be eligible for appropriate support services, relying on R (Kimani) v London Borough of Lambeth [2003] EWCA Civ 1159 and N v UK (2008) 47 EHRR 885. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am
However, RBK&C maintained that such a breach could be averted by Mr De A's return to Portugal, where he would be eligible for appropriate support services, relying on R (Kimani) v London Borough of Lambeth [2003] EWCA Civ 1159 and N v UK (2008) 47 EHRR 885. [read post]
