Search for: "Lambeth v. Lambeth"
Results 121 - 140
of 276
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2011, 11:11 am
The judge granted possession, considering himself bound by Kay v Lambeth, and refused to consider the art 8 defence. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:11 am
The judge granted possession, considering himself bound by Kay v Lambeth, and refused to consider the art 8 defence. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:13 pm
He decided to leave the gathering on its second day, and explained his reasons in an announcement that castigated Canterbury's manipulation of the discussion process.It turns out that many of the other Primates attending were new to the game, and had little understanding of the divisive steps taken by ECUSA in 2003 with the consecration of Bishop V. [read post]
11 May 2009, 11:38 am
This issue went to the Court of Appeal in A, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth [2008] EWCA Civ 1445, which found no breach of Art 6. [read post]
27 May 2019, 1:00 am
London Borough of Lambeth v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government & Ors, heard 21 May 2019. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:01 am
In his view, the relevant principles were established by Lord Bingham in Kay v Lambeth Borough Council [2006] 2 AC 465 [44], in which it was held that the doctrine of precedent required the domestic courts to follow a House of Lords decision where there was a conflict between that authority and a judgment of the Strasbourg Court. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:46 am
The case you are thinking of is M v Hammersmith & Fulham LBC [2008] UKHL 14, [2008] 1 WLR 535. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:46 am
The case you are thinking of is M v Hammersmith & Fulham LBC [2008] UKHL 14, [2008] 1 WLR 535. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 5:21 pm
480/08 Texeira v LB Lambeth (on reference from Teixeira v London Borough of Lambeth [2008] EWCA Civ 1088 (our report here) ) has also been decided. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 8:20 pm
The House of Lords had in effect approved McLellan in Kay v Lambeth London Borough Council [2006] 2 AC 465. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 2:24 pm
And then some County Court cases on quantum: Gorman and Lane v Lambeth LBC, Lambeth County Court, 1 November 2009. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 2:24 pm
And then some County Court cases on quantum: Gorman and Lane v Lambeth LBC, Lambeth County Court, 1 November 2009. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 2:29 pm
In addition, there was not time to consider Teixeira v Lambeth and Ibrahim v Harrow properly, but it may be that further clarification was required in this area. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 2:29 pm
In addition, there was not time to consider Teixeira v Lambeth and Ibrahim v Harrow properly, but it may be that further clarification was required in this area. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
Lambeth v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
It also offends against the Lambeth LBC v Rogers (1999) 32 HLR 361 principle of retrospective revival. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 11:56 pm
Hughes from his Forcelux v. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 1:50 pm
On 3. the Court was not prepared to entertain what could be construed as a challenge to the Choice Based Letting scheme as a whole, Lambeth LBC v A. and Lindsay [2002] EWCA 1084 followed. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 3:35 am
Of course, this may not be that issue and the Supreme Court may just follow Lord Bingham in Kay v Lambeth. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 3:11 am
Click to read full article [read post]
