Search for: "Lambeth v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 144
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2009, 11:38 am
This issue went to the Court of Appeal in A, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth [2008] EWCA Civ 1445, which found no breach of Art 6. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
Unsurprisingly, the Divisional Court followed the clear ruling by the House of Lords in Kay v London Borough of Lambeth [2006] AC 465 that domestic rules of precedent applied. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 12:55 pm
The European Court of Human Rights has made clear in Connors v UK (2005) 40 EHRR 9 and McCann v UK (19009/04), that each person faced with eviction proceedings should be able to have a court assess the proportionality of the proposed eviction and, whilst the House of Lords haven’t quite gone as far as this yet, in both Kay v LB Lambeth [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 AC 465 and Doherty v Birmingham CC [2008] UKHL 57, they made clear that the approach… [read post]
20 May 2019, 1:00 am
On Tuesday 21 May, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal London Borough of Lambeth v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government & Ors. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:00 am
London Borough of Lambeth v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government & Ors, heard 21 May 2019. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 2:41 am
 The facts were as stated in our previous note. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 1:50 pm
On 3. the Court was not prepared to entertain what could be construed as a challenge to the Choice Based Letting scheme as a whole, Lambeth LBC v A. and Lindsay [2002] EWCA 1084 followed. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 12:58 am
And finally…I In that rather esoteric common law jurisdiction known as the United States of America, the US 6th Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed the lower court’s decision that the Universal Life Church has standing to pursue its challenge to a Tennessee law prohibiting persons who have been ordained online from solemnizing marriages: Universal Life Church Monastery Storehouse v Nabors (6th Cir, May 27, 2022). [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 1:00 am
London Borough of Lambeth v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government & Ors, heard 21 May 2019. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:51 am
Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Lambeth v Loveridge, heard 21 October 2014. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 6:11 pm
R (RJM) (FC) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] UKHL 63 This House of Lords judgment is now just under two weeks old, but I think it is still worthy of comment here. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:36 pm
(d) the decision of the House of Lords in Kay v LB Lambeth [2006] 2 AC 465 had attempted to deal with these two ECtHR cases and had concluded that the right of a public authority landlord to enforce a claim for possession would, in most cases, automatically be justified under Art. 8(2). [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 2:36 pm
A difficult point and the finding perhaps goes against the tenor, if not the letter, of the judgment in Lambeth LBC v Johnston. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm
The case of McLaughlin v London Borough of Lambeth was settled just before the commencement of a 20 day trial by Eady J. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:15 am
Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Lambeth v Loveridge, heard 21 October 2014. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 11:56 pm
Hughes from his Forcelux v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
Rimer LJ in Lambeth v Johnston was right to describe the opportunity of face to face advocacy as "a potentially invaluable procedural right in all cases". [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
Rimer LJ in Lambeth v Johnston was right to describe the opportunity of face to face advocacy as "a potentially invaluable procedural right in all cases". [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 2:34 pm
Such are the facts of The State of Texas, Appellant v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 10:56 am
Raulin v Minister van Onderwijs en Wetenschappen Case C-357/89 states that duration of work is a finding of fact, but also supports taking the previous wok history into account. [read post]
