Search for: "Lami v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 40
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2023, 7:53 am
” R v Papalia stated that causing bodily harm to the victim is not an essential element of the offence of sexual assault with a weapon. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:26 pm
If your policy is for the state minimum of $25k, then you are entitled to the full amount but you will still not be fully compensated for your loss. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm
United States Texas State Representative, Giovanni Capriglione, introduced a privacy bill to the state legislature which closely follows the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
(IPblog) US General – Decisions District Court E D Wisconsin: Can a trade secret licensee state a claim? [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
(Chicago IP Litigation Blog) Patent Compliance Group - First false marking declaratory judgment action filed: North States Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
Ezendam B.V. v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
: In re Kubin and KSR International Co v Teleflex Inc (Patent Docs) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: USPTO, Tafas & GSK request extension for reconsideration (IP Watchdog) CAFC: Patent on sex aid is obvious: Ritchie v Vast Resources (AKA Topco) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Assigning patent rights: Euclid Chemical v Vector Corrosion (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) District Court E D Michigan: LEDdynamics wins summary judgment in LED tube patent suit… [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 7:59 am
Helping Family Voices address these challenges are partners at the state Title V/CSHCN agency, the Children's Hospital, Agenda for Children, MCH, the UAP, and the Academy of Pediatrics. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 7:27 am
There are more cases on this point than we care to think about, but here are a few: Lamie v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 5:32 am
For example, Maria V. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271… [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling that struck down Roe v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
Multimedia, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 1:39 am
Kesler, Kansas decision as to lack of authority of MERS; LaSalle Bank v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:57 am
" Lamie v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
. ~~~ The State: New York The Case: In re: Ferrel L. [read post]
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm
" Even if it were treated as surplusage, though, the court held that it should not give meaning to surplusage if doing so would be demonstrably at odds with the legislative intent, citing Lamie v. [read post]
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm
" Even if it were treated as surplusage, though, the court held that it should not give meaning to surplusage if doing so would be demonstrably at odds with the legislative intent, citing Lamie v. [read post]
