Search for: "Lancaster v. Lancaster" Results 181 - 200 of 526
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2012, 12:30 am by Michael Scutt
Ideally that selection criteria should be objective and non-discriminatory as possible, although previous case law (Mitchells of Lancaster (Brewers)Ltd v Tattersall) has held that using non-objective criteria is not fatal to a redundancy selection exercise, provided the criteria is used fairly. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:41 am by sally
Supreme Court W (Children), Re (Rev 1) [2010] UKSC 12 (03 March 2010) Lewis, R (on the application of) v Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council & Anor (Rev 1) [2010] UKSC 11 (03 March 2010) Martin v Her Majesty’s Advocate [2010] UKSC 10 (03 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) R v W [2010] EWCA Crim 372 (02 March 2010) NW, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 404 (03 March 2010) Costello v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 371 (02 March 2010) Lancaster,… [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 10:55 am by Lee Tankle
On February 4, 2015, the Commonwealth Court addressed and affirmed these principles in the case of Janice Donahay v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 12:21 pm by Matthew Landis
Matt Landis is an attorney at Russell, Krafft & Gruber, LLP, in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. [read post]