Search for: "Lancaster v. Secretary of State"
Results 1 - 20
of 20
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
Then, Mongols Nation filed a certificate of dissolution with the California Secretary of State. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
Then, Mongols Nation filed a certificate of dissolution with the California Secretary of State. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 1:30 am
The inspector’s finding in the Lancaster case that the land was not acquired and held pursuant to statutory education purposes was inconsistent with the evidence and irrational. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:24 pm
Perez, in his Official Capacity as United States Secretary of Labor, The Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor; Dr. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:41 am
Supreme Court W (Children), Re (Rev 1) [2010] UKSC 12 (03 March 2010) Lewis, R (on the application of) v Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council & Anor (Rev 1) [2010] UKSC 11 (03 March 2010) Martin v Her Majesty’s Advocate [2010] UKSC 10 (03 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) R v W [2010] EWCA Crim 372 (02 March 2010) NW, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 404 (03 March 2010) Costello v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 371 (02 March 2010) Lancaster,… [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:05 am
Sebelius, Secretary, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al, gripped a good part of the nation in anticipation. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:00 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12-14 January 2016. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 4:42 pm
- Hartford lawyer Daniel Schwartz of Pullman & Comley in his Connecticut Employment Law Blog Holding the Government to Its Promises: United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 9:30 am
Cal. 1974) (“a financial statement filed with the California Secretary of State”); In re Tamis, 398 B.R. 124, 126 (Bankr. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:32 pm
Kennedy with the decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:04 pm
Smith of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, who presided over United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Final Report to the Secretary of the Army on the Nuernberg War Crimes Trials under Control Council Law No. 10 1 v. (1849) Taylor, Telford; Germany (Territory under Allied occupation, 1945-1955 - U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Apr. 17, 2009)Affirming JV ($10K wages; $20K comps; $220K atty fees) for fired rental car company station manager on her sex harass-based retaliation/discharge state law claims; but reducing punitive damages award from $500K to $120K)Commentary on previously reported Federal Appellate Court decisions> 3rd Cir.o o No need to accommodate shorter commuteParker v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 1:12 pm
I have linked each company name to its corresponding record at the Massachusetts Secretary of State's office (or Secretary of the Commonwealth – whatever). [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Click Here Pennsylvania Steel Beam and Concrete Manufacturers Settle Chemical Release Reporting Violations at Lancaster, Williamsport and Denver Plants. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:01 am
Glenn Sulmasy, JAG and law professor at the US Coast Guard academy, and John Yoo have published a new article in the UCLA law review, "Challenges to Civilian Control of the Military: A Rational Choice Approach to the War on Terror," 54 UCLALR 1815 (August 2007). [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
