Search for: "Landes v. Smith"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,035
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2010, 3:15 am
Regina (Smith) v Land Registry [2010] EWCA Civ 200; [2010] WLR (D) 72 “Title to land over which a public highway runs could not be acquired by adverse possession. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 9:45 am
The case of Smith v Smith [2009] EWCA Civ 1297, reported today, is of considerable interest. [read post]
2 May 2009, 3:24 pm
Yesterday, the British Columbia Court of Appeal released reasons for judgment in Smith v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 4:39 am
Smith and another v Jafton Properties Ltd; [2011] EWCA Civ 1251; [2011] WLR (D) 314 “At common law an assignment of part of a leased property by which the leased property was physically severed had the effect that the holder of each severed part had privity of estate with the landlord only in respect of that severed part. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 10:00 am
After a few false starts, Smith again attempted to drain the land, and filed the appropriate forms with the Department in 2008. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:11 am
Canwell Estate Co Ltd v Smith Brothers Farms Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 237; [2012] WLR (D) 59 “The prohibition introduced by the Rentcharges Act 1977 against creation of new rentcharges by a rent owner against a landowner did not apply to the creation of a rentcharge incorporated in a transfer made in 1990 the amount of which was calculated annually as a fixed proportion of the claimant’s costs, expenses and outgoings incurred in fulfilling its obligations under a covenant to… [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 2:16 pm
In Fulton v. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 4:33 pm
Alvarez v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 7:21 am
State v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
Smith, 494 U.S. 872, 883–85 (1990), and re-establish the “balancing” test established by Sherbert v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 7:24 am
Last year we reported the decision R (Smith) v Land Registry [2009] EWHC 328 (Admin) in which the High Court held (amongst other things) that it was impossible to acquire land by adverse possession if that land was subject to a public highway. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 7:55 am
In Smith v Smith, --- F.3d ----, 2020 WL 5742023 (5th Cir., 2020) Colin David Smith filed a petition under the Hague Convention asserting that Sarah Elizabeth Smith wrongfully removed their children from Argentina to Texas. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 10:23 pm
Smith, 2008 BCSC 348, after hearing two appeals from the Registrar's decisions.This decision makes estate planning with land easier. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
But Smith sounded most like Reynolds v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 11:06 am
There seems to be no reason in principle why not but R (Smith) v Land Registry (Peterborough) [2009] EWHC 328 (Admin) â€â [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 7:22 pm
“The next Supreme Court pick could shape Indian law for decades; The highest court in the land holds legal power over tribal nations, but it lacks knowledge of tribal law”: Anna V. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 8:17 am
Hannah Smith and Luke Goodrich at the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty filed an amicus brief in support of petitioner in Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 12:49 pm
Smith The first of many coastal land loss lawsuits filed by Louisiana coastal parishes has proceeded to judgment, with the result being the dismissal of the case based on the failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 5:36 pm
Smith v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 4:19 am
My friends in the environmental bar would appreciate clarification of the scope of “physical damage to land” nuisance, and of Rylands v Fletcher, but can Smith overcome her loss on damages as well as liability? [read post]
