Search for: "Landmark Communications v. Commonwealth" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2008, 3:43 pm
The settlement resolves a class action lawsuit, Hutchinson v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
The chapter builds on the author’s previous published work on the Case by considering how the works of the European ius commune and English canon law which were manipulated in the Case in order to justify a common law rule of monetary nominalism.Banks v Whetson (1596), which is to appear in Landmark Cases in Property Law, ed. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 3:37 pm
The settlement resolves a class action lawsuit, Hutchinson v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 10:33 pm
I Protecting the SOVEREIGN - The Royal Mint v The Commonwealth Mint I BGH on the freedom of the seas, ahm, panorama I ESPN: When Teflon is not enough in the face of platform disruption I BREAKING: CJEU in Filmspeler rules that the sale of a multimedia player is a ‘communication to the public’ I Filmspeler, the right of communication to the public, and unlawful streams: a landmark decision I Varsity Brands and Star Atheltica - A Closer Look I… [read post]
9 May 2017, 12:59 pm
 BREAKING: CJEU in Filmspeler rules that the sale of a multimedia player is a ‘communication to the public’IPKat Eleonora Rosati discusses the newly issued and meanwhile long-awaited CJEU’s decision in Filmpeler, C-527/15.Filmspeler, the right of communication to the public, and unlawful streams: a landmark decisionEver-productive Eleonora gives a more detailed review on the Filmspeler decision, and explains why it is a MAJOR copyright… [read post]
16 May 2017, 2:55 am
I Protecting the SOVEREIGN - The Royal Mint v The Commonwealth Mint I BGH on the freedom of the seas, ahm, panorama I ESPN: When Teflon is not enough in the face of platform disruption I BREAKING: CJEU in Filmspeler rules that the sale of a multimedia player is a ‘communication to the public’ I Filmspeler, the right of communication to the public, and unlawful streams: a landmark decision I Varsity Brands and Star Atheltica - A Closer Look I… [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
The first amendment combined with the supreme court’s 1964 landmark case of New York Times v Sullivan means that the bar is set very high for celebrities or public figures who want to sue for defamation. [read post]
23 May 2017, 11:28 pm
I Protecting the SOVEREIGN - The Royal Mint v The Commonwealth Mint I BGH on the freedom of the seas, ahm, panorama I ESPN: When Teflon is not enough in the face of platform disruption I BREAKING: CJEU in Filmspeler rules that the sale of a multimedia player is a ‘communication to the public’ I Filmspeler, the right of communication to the public, and unlawful streams: a landmark decision I Varsity Brands and Star Atheltica - A Closer Look I… [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 2:33 am
I Protecting the SOVEREIGN - The Royal Mint v The Commonwealth Mint I BGH on the freedom of the seas, ahm, panorama I ESPN: When Teflon is not enough in the face of platform disruption I BREAKING: CJEU in Filmspeler rules that the sale of a multimedia player is a ‘communication to the public’ I Filmspeler, the right of communication to the public, and unlawful streams: a landmark decision I Varsity Brands and Star Atheltica - A Closer Look I… [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am by rainey Reitman
Retrospective locational tracking)  EFF’s Amicus Brief in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Dr Rolph’s account of the tortuous process by which uniform defamation law was achieved in 2005 leads us closer to an understanding of the problem, by explaining that, until Commonwealth Attorney-General Philip Ruddock threatened to draft Commonwealth legislation based on the communications and corporations power, defamation law reform was rarely seen by state politicians as having any sort of priority. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 2:08 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
   Recently, in Virginia, the Department entered into a landmark settlement agreement with the Commonwealth, which will shift Virginia’s developmental disabilities system from one heavily reliant on large, state-run institutions to one focused on safe, individualized, and community-based services that promote integration, independence and full participation by people with disabilities in community life. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am by Barry Sookman
This post reviews some of the highlights of the court battles of 2014 in Canada and other Commonwealth countries, the United States and the European Union. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
Commonwealth prosecutors have declined to charge the ABC journalist Dan Oakes over his reporting of alleged war crimes by Australian special forces in Afghanistan. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On 19 February 2021 Saini J handed down judgment in the case of Sellers v Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth And Development Affairs & Anor [2021] EWHC 358 (QB)   He dismissed claims by Paul Sellers, the former Country Director of the British Council in Italy, that two emails (of three complained of) sent by staff at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and the British Council were defamatory of him at common law. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:54 am by Ray Dowd
David joined Woodcock Washburn in 2005, where he litigates intellectual property cases.David was also lead counsel (pro bono) in the landmark case Nixon v. [read post]