Search for: "Lane v. Director of Revenue"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2017, 4:29 pm
In Rahimi v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:15 am
Sys. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 7:47 am
David KaplanHani FarahIn a recent post (here), David Kaplan of the Saxena White P.A. law firm and Lane Arnold, a Senior Director – Legal at the University of Texas/Texas A&M Investment Management Company (UTIMCO), discussed the Catch-22 in which the court’s rulings in the Valeant securities class action opt-out cases had put prospective securities suit opt-outs. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 3:29 pm
Post and Beam Equity Group, LLC v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:09 pm
Yesterday I attended the Coral Gables Forum candidates’ debate for Coral Gables Commission Group V election. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 3:14 am
Supreme Court rejected this kind of "end run" in the IPO Laddering Antitrust Case (Credit Suisse v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 12:26 am
Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 9:14 am
http://j.st/G5p Short v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm
The City submitted a $3.3 million dollar revenue bond to fund the sewer project, which was approved by the voters. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 11:29 am
Supreme Court Decision, Lingle v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:04 am
In addition to his role at G-V Capital, Kaplan was a director of one of the companies whose shares were manipulated, and later joined the board of another. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 7:40 pm
Hughes v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:25 am
Bankruptcy Judge Sean Lane. [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:20 pm
For the case, see Lane v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:11 am
BMG v Cox is good, but music industry is still unhappy. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:06 am
The suit says that the schemes run by the credit card giants ban ATM operators in some EU countries from charging card holders that use their machines, or, in the countries where they do allow such charges, reduce the revenue operators can receive from interchange fees. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 11:56 am
Since CAIP v. [read post]
