Search for: "Lane v. Franks"
Results 81 - 100
of 168
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2015, 3:07 pm
In Teague v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:29 am
At JURIST, Jaclyn Belczyk reports on Thursday’s decision in Lane v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:00 am
The case underlines the dangers of complacency and the importance of evidence, even when the point in dispute (has the mark BIG MAC been used for hamburgers) appears a simple one.Contribution to the Art Award – Frank Industries v Nike – Frank Industries’ brave fight against the bigger and badder Nike in securing an interim injunction over Nike’s use of LNDR (and then following up with a win at trial a short while later) won this award.Case of the… [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 3:41 pm
Second, in 2001, in Circuit City Stores v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:41 pm
Second, in 2001, in Circuit City Stores v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 7:58 am
In Lane v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 11:47 am
Second, in 2001, in Circuit City Stores v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:12 am
” At the Competitive Enterprise Institute blog, Frank Bedarz discusses the institute’s cert petition in Frank v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 7:42 pm
Yet that’s the general proposition that comes out of the case of Lane v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:00 am
Evans v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 10:18 am
The plaintiff in a third case, Lane v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:26 am
In any event, today’s Supreme Court decision in Lane v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:35 pm
§ 3347(a)(1)(B)—which is exactly what the Dodd-Frank Act does.The President’s interpretation of the FVRA runs contrary to Dodd-Frank’s later-enacted, more specific, and mandatory text. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:35 pm
§ 3347(a)(1)(B)—which is exactly what the Dodd-Frank Act does.The President’s interpretation of the FVRA runs contrary to Dodd-Frank’s later-enacted, more specific, and mandatory text. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 8:37 am
Myers Co. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 6:19 am
Hood v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:21 am
Franks, 13-483. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 2:17 pm
Cook 409 F Supp. 2d 484, 507 S.D.N.Y. 2006) “or modification by defendants” (Frank Music Corp. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 8:45 am
In Gilmer v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 7:19 am
In Borden Dairy Co. of Alabama, LLC v. [read post]
