Search for: "Lane v. Superior Court"
Results 81 - 100
of 210
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2021, 7:40 am
The Court of Appeals rejected the defendant’s argument that the superior court lacked jurisdiction to try him for the misdemeanor because the charging document upon which the State proceeded in superior court was a statement of charges rather than an indictment and Defendant had not first been tried in district court. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 7:07 am
Lane Bryant, Inc., 432 Mass. 165 (2000), and Wiedmann v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm
Superior Court (2020) 52 Cal.App.5th 837, and my 8/5/20 and 8/26/20 posts on it can be found here and here. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:42 am
"Simmons v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 11:29 am
Superior Court (1995) 9 Cal.4th 559, 566-568.) [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 7:17 pm
Williams v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 7:29 am
Mahmood v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 9:45 am
Lane v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 4:50 am
The Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court issued a ruling several months ago in State v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 10:40 am
The insurer then filed a motion in the Superior Court asking for a reduction in the damage award. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 3:16 am
Supreme Court's complete decision here: Lane v. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 6:50 am
Among other things, she referred to the Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
In December 2019, the Supreme Court granted review in County of Butte v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 10:40 am
The insurer then filed a motion in the Superior Court asking for a reduction in the damage award. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 4:33 pm
Citizens for a Responsible Caltrans Decision v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 7:42 pm
Lane, ___ N.C. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 12:22 pm
The Opinion of the Appellate Court Upon consideration, the court affirmed the superior court’s dismissal of the plaintiff’s claim. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am
Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) This was an appeal to the High Court of a decision by the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC) that the maximum fair rent payable by Mr Murphy for the flat in Brick Lane, Spitalfields was £8.50 per week. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am
Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) This was an appeal to the High Court of a decision by the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC) that the maximum fair rent payable by Mr Murphy for the flat in Brick Lane, Spitalfields was £8.50 per week. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 4:56 am
Lane v Commissioner of Environmental Protection, 2014 WL 4814520 (CT 10/7/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR314/314CR89.pdf Filed under: Current Caselaw, Non-Conforming Uses [read post]
