Search for: "Lang v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 754
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Utilizing a different rationale, the court in Avon State Bank v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:47 am by Rosalind English
MP, R(on the application of) v the Secretary of State for Justice   [2012] EWHC 214 (Admin) – read judgment The prison authorities had acted unlawfully in restricting childcare resettlement leave to prisoners who were within two years of their release date and had been allocated to “open” conditions. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 8:33 am by Pamela C. Maloney
Case date: 11 June 2021 Case number: No. 2020-1760 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am by ELLIOT GOLD
After mentioning a number of authorities, it stated that the test of dishonesty was that clearly explained by Lord Hoffman in Barlow Clowes International Ltd v Eurotrust International Ltd [2005] UKPC 37 at [10]: [emphasis added] Although a dishonest state of mind is a subjective mental state, the standard by which the law determines whether it is dishonest is objective. [read post]
Comment The Court of Appeal noted that it was unfortunate that the trial judge was not referred to Hallen v Brabantia. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am by Roshonda Scipio
Volume I, Dynamic jurisprudential thought / Charles Mwalimu.Mwalimu, Charles.New York : Peter Lang, c2010.AntitrustKF1649.A2 C49 2009Circuit conflicts in antitrust litigation / John H. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 2:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Lockwood Reexamination Gripe Goes Nowhere As discussed last week, the case of Lockwood v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Put in a more elegant way, the Appellate Term decided Garg v Wigler   2012 NY Slip Op 50494(U) Decided on March 20, 2012   Appellate Term, First Department: "Accepting plaintiff's allegations as true, and according them the benefit of every favorable inference, as we must in the context of a motion to dismiss on the pleadings (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]), we find the complaint, as amplified by plaintiff's verified answers to… [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Samar, Toward a New Separation of Church and State: Implications for Analogies to the Supreme Court Decision in Hobby Lobby by the Decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 11:30 am by Kevin Schad appellate division SDOH
In an unpublished decision rendered on September 14, 2010, (United States v. [read post]