Search for: "Langford v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2011, 10:29 pm by cf
Yesterday's 10 Cir. decision (United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2012, 7:19 am by Joel R. Brandes
Maritza Meszaros Reyes, filed a petition seeking a declaration that respondent, Harry Lee Langford Jeffcoat, had wrongfully retained the parties' two minor children in the United States and that Venezuela, not the United States, was the "habitual residence" of the children pursuant to the Hague Convention. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 9:45 am
We will be covering family-based immigration law and outlining the procedures involved in petitioning for a family member to immigrate to the United States. [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:29 am by John Elwood
Langford, 16-886 Issues: (1) Whether a state court unreasonably applied this court’s cases under Section 2254(d)(1) when it held that a misplaced adverb in one jury instruction on state law did not violate federal due process; and (2) whether the U.S. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Is There a Thumb on the Scale in Refugee Convention Appellate Court Adjudication in the United States? [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:44 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Reyes v Jeffcoat, 2012 WL 2428587 (D.S.C.) the Petitioner, Maritza Meszaros Reyes and the Respondent, Harry Lee Langford Jeffcoat were married and had three children, one of whom was over the age of 16. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:22 pm by Aurora Barnes
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit’s reasoning in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am by MOTP
Schiro No. 18-0278 (Tex. 2019) (attorney fee award based on fee-shifting statute reversed and remanded for redetermination).Cognate Place Name   ROHRMOOS VENTURE, ERIC LANGFORD, DAN BASSO, AND TOBIN GROVE, Petitioners,v.UTSW DVA HEALTHCARE, LLP, Respondent. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Hill, 147 N.E.2d 321, 325 (Ill. 1958) (“a vested right to punitive, exemplary, vindictive or aggravated damages arises only when such damages have been allowed by a judgment); Langford v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Hill, 147 N.E.2d 321, 325 (Ill. 1958) (“a vested right to punitive, exemplary, vindictive or aggravated damages arises only when such damages have been allowed by a judgment); Langford v. [read post]