Search for: "Lanham v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 2,897
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
Ouyeinc, Ltd. v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 8:40 am
Delta T LLC v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 6:21 am
Gates Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 12:39 am
You might recall that the Court addressed Lanham Act standing earlier this term in Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 10:05 am
The September 16 opinion in Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:26 pm
The decision is Organ Recovery Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 1:34 am
Consequently, the appellate court remanded the case to the trial court to allow it to reconsider this award (4 Pillar Dynasty LLC v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 10:17 am
Creative Impact Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 9:43 am
In Matal v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 7:22 am
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 11:03 am
Lorillard alleged that Elston, in violation of the Lanham Act and state law, knowingly bought and sold counterfeit Newport cigarettes. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:44 am
American Board of Internal Medicine v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 4:03 am
§§ 1051 et. seq. ('the Lanham Act'). [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 10:31 pm
The Supreme Court stated in Dastar that section 43(a) of the Lanham Act does not have boundless application as a remedy for unfair trade practices. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 10:03 am
Harjo v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 8:26 am
LLC v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 9:35 am
Circuit Court considered the extraterritorial scope of the Copyright Act in light of Spanski v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 11:31 am
LegalForce RAPC Worldwide P.C. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 9:47 am
S.A.S. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 11:20 am
Supreme Court had already addressed whether Congress had the authority to abrogate state immunity for acts of patent infringement and for violating section 43(a) of the Lanham Trademark Act. [read post]
