Search for: "Lanham v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 2,897
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2013, 7:37 pm by John W. Arden
To state a trademark infringement claim under the Lanham Act, a plaintiff must allege that its mark is protectable, and the defendant’s use of an identical or similar mark in commerce is likely to cause confusion among consumers. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 9:18 am by Kristin Johnson
Supreme Court just announced that it will weigh in on this case, Vidal v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 10:24 pm
  Because the Lanham Act claims failed, the remaining claims likewise failed, and the district court's grant of summary judgment was affirmed.More concerning Natural Answers, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 1:00 pm
There are serious questions to be raised about the legal merits of the NFL's position - among other points, the Lanham Act states that challenges to a trademark can come "at any time. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 4:52 pm by Mark Nieds
SCOTUS Decision The Brunetti case follows an earlier decision, Matal v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 1:00 am by Assen Alexiev
The court remanded trademark infringement and other claims brought by dietary supplement seller Charles Curry to the federal district court in Chicago for further proceedings (Curry v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 3:30 pm by Eric Goldman
Photo credit: scratch around Old key hole // ShutterStockSome states, including Virginia, require locksmiths to obtain state-issued licenses. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 7:54 am by Bonnie Park
  The case Pernod Ricard USA, LLC v. [read post]