Search for: "Lanham v. State"
Results 301 - 320
of 2,895
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2022, 5:57 am
Borden Ice Cream Co v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 4:20 am
The United States Olympic Committee v. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 8:08 am
According to the court, a straightforward application of Section 2(d) of the Lanham Act to the facts before the court supported Brittex’s argument for its priority. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 1:08 pm
McLaughlin v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 6:03 am
Opinion, at pp. 2-3 (citing Couture v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 3:29 am
Tam and Iancu v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 8:34 am
In the recent Ohio State University v. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 10:30 am
The case captioned Purdue University v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm
The Statement explicitly states that those journal submissions which fail to conform to the virulently anti-Israel political viewpoints of the Board and Staff Editors will be summarily rejected. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 4:21 am
See Couture v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
The Lanham Act seems to say no, and the U.S. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 5:05 am
Watkins sued McCormick under the Lanham Act and coordinate state law. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 1:50 pm
De Cortes v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 11:18 am
The answer though is pretty clear under Brunette Machine Works, Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:13 am
Brittex Financial v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
Ouyeinc, Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
Legat v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 9:59 am
BPI Sports, LLC v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 11:11 am
TocMail Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 9:03 am
The shopping mall operator plaintiff prevailed on every significant issue, and the case failed to satisfy the Lanham Act’s requirement that a case be “exceptional” before fees could be awarded (Simon Property Group, L.P. v. [read post]
