Search for: "Lanham v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 2,897
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2023, 10:21 am
In Abitron Austria GmbH v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 7:57 am
ShareIt is fair to expect Wednesday’s arguments in Jack Daniel’s Properties v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 7:39 am
WatsonSeal Marketing LLC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 8:31 am
Harbor Breeze Corp. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Rogers v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 11:54 am
” FedEx brought Lanham Act and Tennessee Consumer Protection Act claims. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 2:12 pm
Circuit (Jan. 26, 2010) (explaining that "the court strongly urges parties to limit the use of acronyms"), with Int'l Org. of Masters, Mates & Pilots, ILA, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 8:23 am
Krikor v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 8:22 am
Zamfir v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:33 pm
In the Hermès v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:50 am
March 2, 2023 | By: David Ludwig Last month, the Fourth Circuit issued a landmark intellectual property ruling in The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
Grimaldi) whereby the right to protect a registered trade mark (a protection given in the USA law essentially by the Lanham Act), under some circumstances, cannot be enforced to detriment of “the right of others to express themselves freely in their own artistic work” (from the Rogers v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 9:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit erred in awarding civil remedies under the Lanham Act for infringement of U.S. trademarks through purely foreign sales that neither reached the United States nor confused U.S. consumers. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 9:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit erred in awarding civil remedies under the Lanham Act for infringement of U.S. trademarks through purely foreign sales that neither reached the United States nor confused U.S. consumers. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm
McKenna: we can’t really mean that a state of uncertainty is actionable—if we did, “I don’t know whether X makes this” would be actionable/part of the “confused” group. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
LTTB v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 11:22 am
Midler v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 5:59 am
PetConnect Rescue, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 6:35 am
Jones v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 6:29 am
Navatar Group, Inc. v. [read post]
