Search for: "Lanham v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,022
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2006, 9:59 pm
This determination ran counter to CC's argument that the Lanham Act always permits the use in the United States of trademarks affixed by the owner. [read post]
11 May 2016, 4:03 am
Belmora's FLANAXBased on its reading of the Supreme Court’s Lexmark decision, the lower court had dismissed Bayer’s Section 43(a) false association and false advertising claims under FRCP 12(b)(6) and entered judgment on the pleadings as to Bayer’s Section 14(3) claim, ruling that the Lanham Act does not allow an owner of a foreign mark not registered in the United States, who does not use the mark in the United States [Bayer], to… [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 10:36 am
” United We Stand Am., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:42 pm
Oreck Direct, LLC v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:02 am
Sykes in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and assigned case number 17-2252. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 9:14 pm
United Airlines Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 11:27 am
Most people are familiar with the application of federal laws in the United States such as the Lanham Act and the Copyright Act in relation to parallel market issues. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 7:25 am
The United States Supreme Court has agreed to hear a trademark infringement case arising under the Lanham Act that has huge implications for manufacturers and sellers of products based outside the U.S. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 3:57 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 6:02 pm
These lawsuits were consolidated and transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in December 2015. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 8:20 am
Case date: 24 June 2022 Case number: No. 18-302 Court: Supreme Court of the United States A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 12:20 pm
Citing both Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act and Urban Dictionary, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) refused Mr. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 2:28 pm
Tillett retained the right to use the KROMA mark in the United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 4:52 pm
The United States Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit agreed with Brunetti and found this provision unconstitutional. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 9:03 am
Case date: 27 September 2021 Case number: No. 20-14374 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 12:15 am
The Court of Appeal did not mention the fact that the largest baking company in the United States includes the word in its name - Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 9:33 am
Healthmate Int’l, LLC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:47 pm
Two years after the United States Supreme Court struck down the ban on disparaging trademarks, the Supreme Court has now struck down the Lanham Act’s similar ban on the registration of scandalous and immoral trademarks at the U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:47 pm
Two years after the United States Supreme Court struck down the ban on disparaging trademarks, the Supreme Court has now struck down the Lanham Act’s similar ban on the registration of scandalous and immoral trademarks at the U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:35 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia dismissed Bayer’s Section 43(a) false association and false advertising claims under FRCP 12(b)(6) and entered judgment on the pleadings as to Bayer’s Section 14(3) claim, ruling that the Lanham Act does not allow an owner of a foreign mark not registered in the United States, who does not use the mark in the United States [Bayer], to assert priority rights over a mark that is registered and… [read post]
