Search for: "Lanham v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,021
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2020, 9:48 am
The most famous derby in the United States is the Kentucky Derby, but the word traces its roots to a 1780 race in England. [read post]
6 May 2020, 4:11 pm
On Monday, May 4, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 10:11 pm
It is officially part of the United States, but it isn’t really a state. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:42 am
Plaintiff argues that the [United States District Court for the Western District of New York] based its conclusion that the article’s statements were non-actionable solely on its determination that the assertions were statements of opinion, without conducting the more fine-grained analysis required by Milkovich [v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
Amicus Curiae Brief of United States at 5 n.2. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 5:10 am
ITC Limited v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 8:13 am
The complaint asserts that since Red Bull's introduction in 1996, over four billion units have been sold in the United States and over one billion dollars have been spent on advertising, marketing and promoting the Red Bull energy drink. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 11:20 am
Supreme Court had already addressed whether Congress had the authority to abrogate state immunity for acts of patent infringement and for violating section 43(a) of the Lanham Trademark Act. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 3:00 am
A Spanish importer/distributor sold Spanish Kids dolls in the United States. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 2:29 am
Rather, the loser’s recourse is to commence a de novo law suit under the national law of its jurisdiction which, in the case of the United States would be a claim under the Lanham Act. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 11:36 am
Defendant Singh is listed as the President and sole principal of United HBA. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 10:21 am
Children’s Health Defense v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 6:42 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (here) dismissing Bayer's claims on the ground that it lacked standing, and it remanded the case to the district court for further proceedings.According to the INTA brief:The Court should grant Certiorari because this case presents a timely opportunity to provide clarity and guidance on an issue of great importance to trademark owners, namely: can the owner of a foreign trademark establish standing to pursue claims under Sections 14(3) or… [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 4:20 am
Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Lee v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:31 am
Lanham Act (a very interesting decision that I finally got around to reading this morning – see: POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 12:00 am
Last December, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found the Lanham Act’s disparagement provision unconstitutional, stating that while the rejected trademarks “convey hurtful speech that harms members of oft-stigmatized communities,” the First Amendment “protects even hurtful speech. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 2:50 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Ameritech, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 6:11 pm
When Gillet discovered that plaintiffs were selling similar pliers in the United States, the company sued them for patent infringement. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 9:55 am
Los Angeles, CA - Trademark attorneys for Mexico's Club De Futbol America filed a trademark infringement, trademark dilution and Lanham Act 43(a) unfair competition lawsuit at the Los Angeles Federal District Court against operators of a soccer club using the Club America trademark in the United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 1:50 pm
In comparison to the Lanham Act, which is predominantly enforced by private suits, the FDCA does not permit private enforcement suits and grants the United States nearly exclusive enforcement authority and pre-empts certain state misbranding laws. [read post]
