Search for: "Lanham v. United States of America"
Results 1 - 20
of 154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2012, 10:31 am
Gucci America, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 9:55 am
Los Angeles, CA - Trademark attorneys for Mexico's Club De Futbol America filed a trademark infringement, trademark dilution and Lanham Act 43(a) unfair competition lawsuit at the Los Angeles Federal District Court against operators of a soccer club using the Club America trademark in the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 8:54 am
In a recent ruling, the United States District Court for the for the District of Maine ruled that a future competitor of Poland Springs® lacked Article III standing to bring a Lanham Act false advertising suit against the Nestlé Waters. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:25 am
AFL Telecommunications LLC v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 1:36 am
Healthport Corp. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 6:18 am
Operation Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 12:15 am
The Court of Appeal did not mention the fact that the largest baking company in the United States includes the word in its name - Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 10:15 am
. - The Supreme Court of the United States agreed to review the judgments of several Courts of Appeals in four intellectual property disputes. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
Case date: 17 March 2021 Case number: No. 19-2316 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 9:47 am
S.A.S. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 4:09 am
True, the Second Circuit has indicated that “use in commerce” is broader than “commercial speech,” United We Stand America, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 9:53 am
” Indeed, it is “the sole supplier of thermally buttfused PVC pipe in the United States. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 2:24 am
Rather, the loser’s recourse is to commence a de novo law suit under the national law of its jurisdiction, which in the case of the United States would be a claim under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, [specifically, §1125(d) of the Lanham Act]. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 11:31 am
LegalForce RAPC Worldwide P.C. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 6:38 am
United States of America Rugby Football Union, Ltd., --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2010 WL 3553885 (D. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 10:55 am
Thornton v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 5:48 am
(“NAVL”) of Fort Wayne, Indiana filed suit in the Northern District of Indiana alleging that Defendant, North America Moving & Storage, Inc. of Miami Beach, Florida infringed its rights in United States Trademark Registration No. 917,431 for the mark “NORTHAMERICAN”. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 5:48 am
(“NAVL”) of Fort Wayne, Indiana filed suit in the Northern District of Indiana alleging that Defendant, North America Moving & Storage, Inc. of Miami Beach, Florida infringed its rights in United States Trademark Registration No. 917,431 for the mark “NORTHAMERICAN”. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 6:04 am
Champion Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 2:38 pm
From our colleagues Beverly Pearman and Jeremy Sacks: Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. and Mitsubishi Power Systems Americas, Inc. v. [read post]
