Search for: "Lapidus v. Lapidus"
Results 1 - 20
of 20
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2008, 6:42 am
The Appellate Division, Second Department decision in Lapidus v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:17 pm
Wal-Mart v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:03 pm
Lapidus now appeals. [read post]
8 May 2019, 12:30 pm
She litigated Lenahan v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 1:25 pm
Lapidus [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 9:54 am
” *** Lawyers on this case include Klopfer, Alexandra Freedman Smith, Laura Schauer Ives and Maureen Sanders of the ACLU of New Mexico; and Sherwin and Lenora Lapidus of the ACLU Women’s Rights Project. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 3:18 am
In Lapidus & Associates LLP v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 4:36 pm
Lapidus, 833 S.W.2d 71, 73 (Tenn. 1992)). [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 3:31 am
As based upon this interpretation, Justice Goodman of Supreme Court, New York County has decided Lapidus & Associates, LLP v, Elizabeth Street Inc. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 2:52 pm
" Attorneys on the lawsuit, K.C. et. al v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:31 pm
In 2011, the Commission decided Jessica Lenahan (Gonzales) v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 12:33 am
Slawski CPA PC NEW YORK COUNTY Attorney's Fees Firm Did Not Violate DR 2-107(A) by Not Disclosing To Client Detailed Percentage Fee-Splitting Lapidus & Associates LLP v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 12:38 pm
However, in 2001 the Appeals Court did look to the Zoning Act for guidance in rejecting an enforcement action initiated 23 years after the City of Boston had issued a permit for the use of certain premises in violation of the Boston Zoning Code (Lapidus v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:36 pm
In addition, Lapidus v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:48 am
Market Am., Inc., 15 NY3d 590, 915 N.Y.S.2d 884 [2010]) The elements of a negligence claim are the existence of a duty, a breach of that duty, and damages proximately caused by that breach of duty (Lapidus v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 3:13 pm
In our case Sabbithi v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 5:54 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Town of Castle Rock v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 12:35 pm
v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Co. v Maryland Cas. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
“In the context of an account stated pertaining to legal fees, a firm does ‘not have to establish the reasonableness of its fee'” (Lapidus & Assoc., LLP v Elizabeth St., Inc., 92 AD3d 405, 405 [1st Dept 2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). [read post]
