Search for: "Larkin v. State of Maine"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2020, 10:25 am
This could be her elephantState v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 9:37 am
Larkin, Jr., Public Choice Theory and Occupational Licensing, 39 Harv. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 9:25 am
You can read the brief supporting the motion, but our main constitutional arguments are these: 1. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 5:00 am
State Level Cooperation. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 10:50 am
The main problem with the D.C. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 7:37 am
For instance, a state government can't delegate to a church the power to veto the licensing of a bar—that's the doctrine of Larkin v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 9:49 am
Larkin v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 12:13 pm
Many other cases would also come out of the same way — such as Larkin v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 10:21 am
United States. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Gunderson, 279 S.W.3d 93, 109-110, 112 (Ky. 2008); Larkin v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Mo. 2007).Maine: Violette v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
As the BBC reports here, the Attorney General John Larkin decided not to pursue the case after Hain clarified his statements about a high court judge in his memoirs, ‘Outside In’. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:23 am
Some of the main points I made in the essay: * State Criminal Laws Are Numerous and Broadly Worded * States Create New Stupid Anti-Internet Laws All the Time * States Aren’t the Right Regulators of the Internet * State AGs are Provincial * State AGs Are Elected The essay also gave some examples of how expansive criminal laws can chill Internet entrepreneurship by making entrepreneurs fear for their liberty. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 10:13 pm
Clark's April 27th execution date because there was sufficient evidence that the State of Texas may have misapplied Atkins v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am
He held that “restraints on immorality are the main safeguards of society against influences which might be fatal to it. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 5:00 am
This office will coordinate imple-mentation of the act with other agencies, develop standards and bestpractices for the management of sex offenders, and study issues relat-ing to sex offender management on an ongoing basis.Sections 4 and 5 of the bill amend Mental Hygiene Law § 33. 13 (c) toprovide that clinical records and other identifying information main-tained by OMH or OMRDD related to persons under consideration forproceedings under the new Article 10 of the Mental Hygiene Law… [read post]
