Search for: "Larson v. Secretary of State" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2021, 2:57 pm by Unknown
United States (Wind Energy; National Environmental Policy Act; Endangered Species Act)Larson v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:53 am by Garrett Hinck
Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said the U.S. was ready to talk to North Korea without any preconditions, CNN reported. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:46 am by Josh Blackman
Was there an independent cause of action–separate from the allegation of ultra vires governmental action–in cases like Ex Parte Young (1908), Larson v. [read post]
4 Nov 2017, 4:13 am by Garrett Hinck
Bruce Ackerman summarized oral arguments in Smith v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Christa Culver
The Permanent Mission of India to the United NationsDocket: 10-627Issue(s): 1) Whether, in determining whether Congress authorized the Secretary of State ("Secretary") to preempt traditional state taxing powers by designating certain exemptions from state and local property tax laws under The Foreign Missions Act, 22 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Two Families Got Fed Up with Their States’ Politics. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Ten years later, the 118th Congress includes five Indian Americans; nearly 50 are in state Legislatures. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat)   Global Global – General Moral… [read post]