Search for: "Latham v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2010, 2:49 pm by INFORRM
It was incorrect to state that Ms McKennitt did not claim that the contents of the book were untrue. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In his opposition affidavit, David states that he has no recollection of receiving it, and Singer’s claim that the letter was mailed does not give rise to the presumption of receipt, as he does not present evidence of defendant firm’s office practices pertinent to mailing (see Lindsay v Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano LLP, 129 AD3d 790, 793 [2d Dept 2015]; Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP v Brophy, 19 AD3d 161, 162 [1 st Dept… [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 7:40 am by Frantzeska Papadopoulou
However, Eeva disagreed, stating that in her view the ETSI principle was to license end products and that was how IPR holders had always understood it. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am by INFORRM
Meanwhile Longmore LJ stated that: The question in a case of misuse of private information is whether the information is private, not whether it is true or false. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 4:40 am by jonathanturley
Jackson also prevailed on counts under the Latham Act for false endorsement (Count III) and false advertising (Count IV), conversion (Count V), and unjust enrichment (Count VI). [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 10:21 pm
Counsel for the Claimant was Robert Latham, solicitors were Hopkin Murray Beskine - anyone care to comment further? [read post]
23 May 2013, 4:39 am by Heidi Henson
The coordinated lawsuits stem from David v Signal International LLC, a case that was filed in 2008 on behalf of 12 named plaintiffs and a class of Indian guestworkers. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 9:29 pm by RegBlog
Hodges, same-sex couples could marry in 37 states; now that right reaches across the entire United States. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 1:18 am
So, during oral arguments at the Supreme Court on Monday in Astrue v. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
On the same day judgment was handed down in the case of R (on the application of Jefferies & Ors) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2018] EWHC 3239 (Admin). [read post]