Search for: "Latham v. Williams"
Results 1 - 20
of 60
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2023, 10:36 am
SARANG DAMLE from Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC represented Ralph Oman. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:41 am
O’Brien III, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Thursday, January 19, 2023 Tags: Cryptocurrency, M&A, Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, Securities Act, SPACs, Wong v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:41 am
O’Brien III, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Thursday, January 19, 2023 Tags: Cryptocurrency, M&A, Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, Securities Act, SPACs, Wong v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 11:33 am
Cir. 2008) (Williams, J., concurring). [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 2:44 pm
Latham, Demi S. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 6:58 am
Roman Martinez (Latham Watkins) is set to argue for Warhol and Lisa Blatt (Williams Connolly) for Goldsmith. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:31 am
.), on Friday, March 6, 2020 Tags: Extraterritoriality, Foreign issuers, International governance, Liability standards, Morrison v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:16 am
In Kelley v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia The Sydney Morning Herald reports that One Nation MP Mark Latham has deleted controversial tweets at the centre of a defamation case brought against him by a student cleared of terrorism charges. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Here is the schedule for the 2019 Health Law Professors Conference. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:43 pm
She fills the vacancy created by the retirement of Judge William P. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm
Rulings IPSO has published a single resolution statement and series of rulings from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 03262-18 Stein v The Herald, resolved by IPSO mediation 01724-18 Nightingale v Mail Online, no breach of the IPSO code 01108-18 Mike Ashley and Sports Direct v The Times, breach of provision 1 (Accuracy) 01066-18 Gabriel v The Sun, no breach of the IPSO code 01065-18 Gabriel v Daily Star, no breach of the IPSO code 01064-18… [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 6:02 am
Jackson, Harvard Law School, on Saturday, April 22, 2017 Tags: Accountability, Bank boards, Banks, Boards of Directors, CFPB, Compliance & ethics, Consumer protection, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Incentives, Misconduct, Oversight, Proxy advisors, Risk oversight, Shareholder voting, Wells Fargo Assessing Financial Advisor Compensation Disclosure Following Vento v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 8:27 am
’s argument that ETE was estopped from terminating the pending merger agreement between the two companies failed, despite a dissent by the Chief Justice that reasoned the majority was entertaining the wrong issue just as the lower court had done (The Williams Companies, Inc., v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 1:01 am
Ibrahim, William & Mary Law School, on Wednesday, November 2, 2016 Tags: Capital formation, Crowdfunding, Investor protection, IPOs, JOBS Act, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation,Small firms, Tech companies ISS Proposes New 2017 Voting Policies Posted by Lyuba Goltser, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, on Wednesday, November 2, 2016 Tags: Boards of Directors, Charter & bylaws, Dual-class stock, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, IPOs,ISS, Proxy advisors,… [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:31 pm
Lynch and Williams (2015). [2] Michael Coper, ‘Cole v Whitfield’ in Blackshield et al, The Oxford Companion to the High Court of Australia (2003)108. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:48 am
In the recent opinion by Vice Chancellor Glasscock, The Williams Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 5:00 am
The Delaware Chancery Court took a skeptical view as a result, but observed that "motive to avoid a deal does not demonstrate lack of a contractual right to do so" (The Williams Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 7:32 pm
In an expedited deal litigation matter, in The Williams Company, Inc. v. [read post]
