Search for: "Laughlin v. State of California" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
In 1913, California was one of the first States to prohibit the sale and possession of marijuana, and at the end of the century, California became the first State to authorize limited use of the drug for medicinal purposes. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am by Larry Catá Backer
Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1 (1937) (federal regulatory power extended to intra state activities that could cumulatively have a substantial effect on commerce);  Heart of Atlanta Motel v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:15 am by Cormac Early
Again at the Volokh Conspiracy, Nick Rosencranz responds to arguments in the amicus brief filed by Dale Carpenter and others in United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 11:17 am by Catherine Fisk
State Bar of California), and compulsory student-activity fees because public universities use them to fund all student activities (Board of Regents v. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
[On Tuesday, April 4, Georgetown Law devoted a session of its faculty workshop to honoring the publication of The Hughes Court: From Progressivism to Pluralism, 1930-1941 (Cambridge University Press, 2022), a volume in the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States, by Mark V. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:24 am by Nicholas J. Wagoner
Superior Court of California, a fractured Court addressed minimum contacts. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 3:42 am
PETERSBURG TIMES, by Meg Laughlin, Times Staff Writer, September 14, 2007. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am by Edgar Chen
The Trump Administration, through CFIUS, ultimately declined to block the transaction even though the project was located within 50 miles of Laughlin Air Force Base, the largest training facility for Air Force pilots in the country. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm by Mark Murakami
Matteoni, Matteoni O’Laughlin & Hechtman, San Jose, California, Edward V. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
This Settlement Agreement proposes to compromise a claim the United States has at this Site for Past Response Costs, as those terms are defined in the Settlement Agreement. [read post]