Search for: "Lavelle v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 72
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2023, 6:08 am
The post JARON LAVELLE PURNELL v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:56 am
LaVelle has published Surviving Castro-Huerta: The Historical Perseverance of the Basic Policy of Worcester v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 3:01 am
Superintendent (1962) and Mattz v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 5:06 am
Here is “‘Uncounseled’ convictions a threat to Indians. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 2:18 pm
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Conspiracy to commit arson A jury, in the Circuit Court for Wicomico County, convicted Gregory Washington, appellant, of conspiracy to commit first-degree arson and possession of a destructive device. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 12:11 pm
The case, King v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 6:18 am
In a per curiam opinion, the Court held in Marmet Health Care Center v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 4:52 am
Sbarra Real Estate, Inc. v Lavelle-Tomko, 117 AD3d 1210, 1210 [2014], lv denied 26 NY3d 907 [2015]). [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:10 pm
This is because ICRA allows tribal courts to imprison Indians without the benefit of counsel but does not impact non-Indians, who are entitled to court-appointed counsel in state, federal, and now tribal court, thanks to a recent amendment to ICRA. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:41 am
In Oliphant v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 10:31 am
Earlier today, the Connecticut Appellate Court released Wright v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 3:15 am
Sbarra Real Estate, Inc. v Lavelle-Tomko, 117 AD3d 1210, 1210 [2014], lv denied 26 NY3d 907 [2015]). [read post]
3 May 2012, 6:33 am
A recent and well-reasoned Connecticut Superior Court decision, Roach v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
Lavelle v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 6:23 am
The case Rusinowski v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 9:26 am
In Langenkamp v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 7:09 am
State Farm). [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 5:22 am
According the complaint a liberal construction, accepting the allegations contained therein as true and providing plaintiff with the benefit of every favorable inference, we find that plaintiff sufficiently alleged a violation of Judiciary Law § 487 (compare Lavelle-Tomko v Aswad & Ingraham, 191 AD3d at 1147-1148; Krouner v Koplovitz, 175 AD2d 531, 533 [1991]). [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:58 am
In the civil context, the claim “accrues when the malpractice is committed” (Ruggiero v Powers, 284 AD2d 593, 594 [3d Dept 2001], lv dismissed 97 NY2d 638 [2001]), “not at the time that the injury is discovered” (Lavelle-Tomko v Aswad & Ingraham, 191 AD3d 1142, 1143 [3d Dept 2021]; see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301 [2002]). [read post]
