Search for: "Lavelle-Tomko v Aswad & Ingraham"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2021, 4:52 am
Lavelle-Tomko v Aswad & Ingraham 2021 NY Slip Op 01112 [191 AD3d 1142] February 18, 2021 Appellate Division, Third Department is an example. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 3:15 am
Lavelle-Tomko v Aswad & Ingraham 2021 NY Slip Op 01112 Decided on February 18, 2021 Appellate Division, Third Department is a cautionary tale about ending an attorney-client relationship and the dangers of not keeping good records. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 5:22 am
According the complaint a liberal construction, accepting the allegations contained therein as true and providing plaintiff with the benefit of every favorable inference, we find that plaintiff sufficiently alleged a violation of Judiciary Law § 487 (compare Lavelle-Tomko v Aswad & Ingraham, 191 AD3d at 1147-1148; Krouner v Koplovitz, 175 AD2d 531, 533 [1991]). [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:58 am
In the civil context, the claim “accrues when the malpractice is committed” (Ruggiero v Powers, 284 AD2d 593, 594 [3d Dept 2001], lv dismissed 97 NY2d 638 [2001]), “not at the time that the injury is discovered” (Lavelle-Tomko v Aswad & Ingraham, 191 AD3d 1142, 1143 [3d Dept 2021]; see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301 [2002]). [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 3:22 am
These allegations fail to remedy the deficiencies in the original complaint regarding the element of intentional deceit (see Lavelle-Tomko v Aswad & Ingraham, 191 AD3d 1142, 1147 [3d Dept 2021] [ denying a motion to amend a complaint to plead a cause of action under Judiciary Law § 487 where the proposed amendment failed to plead facts tending to prove the attorney’s intent to deceive]; Genger v Genger, 135 AD3d 454,454 [1st Dept… [read post]
