Search for: "Law v. Cross" Results 421 - 440 of 16,740
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2023, 7:30 am by Elizabeth Goitein
In addition, intelligence and law enforcement agencies have increasingly used specious legal reasoning and deep pockets to buy their way around Carpenter v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
‘Why can we not have a system in which you have to give a cross-undertaking in damages? [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 2:03 pm by Edward T. Kang
” At common law, in most cases, the opposing party would often have to wait until its case in chief, or at least until cross-examination, before entering a remainder into evidence. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 11:15 am by Unknown
Doe, 457 U.S. 202 (1982) [preprint]- Chapter 10: Commentary on Zadvydas v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 1:15 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Relatedly, genetic information and post-offer medical exams recently crossed the radar of the EEOC. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
  Testing and evaluations, including post-deployment performance monitoring, will help ensure that AI systems function as intended, are resilient against misuse or dangerous modifications, are ethically developed and operated in a secure manner, and are compliant with applicable Federal laws and policies. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 3:26 pm by Greg Lambert
Vincent AI then generates a legal memorandum summarizing the relevant law. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 10:30 am by Unknown
," The New Humanitarian, 19 Oct. 2023 [text]Lost at Sea: That time Frontex tried to redefine the notion of distress (RLI Blog, Oct. 2023) [text]On the Need to Align the EU Judicial System with the Supranational Use of Violence: WS v European Border and Coast Guard Agency (EU Immigration & Asylum Law & Policy Blog, Oct. 2023) [text]Where Are We Going? [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 12:53 pm by Georgialee Lang
A 15-day family law trial with the claimant calling 21 witnesses. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 4:11 pm by Jeanne Huang
One such issue came up before the Singapore High Court in the Westbridge Ventures II v Anupam Mittal, succinctly articulated by the General Court as follows:   “which system of law governs the issue of determining subject matter arbitrability at the pre-award stage? [read post]