Search for: "Law v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 167,751
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2009, 3:17 am by Hein Kernkamp
Board of Airline Representatives in The Netherlands v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 11:43 am by Michael Smolensky
Lund: State and Federal Constitutions in Lockstep appeared first on SMOLENSKY LAW - NJ CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYER | Call Now! [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 3:43 am
Challenging deportation decisions quickly Regina (Madan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Regina (Kapoor) v Same Court of Appeal “Applications for judicial review of deportation decisions had to be made promptly. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 1:44 am
MY (Turkey) v Secretary of State for Home Department Court of Appeal “Where an immigration judge found a witness to be reliable and accepted his evidence, it was inappropriate and an error of law for another immigration judge at a second hearing to attack the credibility of the same witness. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 2:40 am
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v Manterfield Court of Appeal “A regulatory body in the United States seeking to enforce disgorgement of proceeds of alleged fraud could be granted a freezing order over assets in the United Kingdom. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:33 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America House of Lords “A person could not be extradited to the United States of America to stand trial on charges brought under US legislation which declared cartels to be illegal, to stand trial for price-fixing offences alleged to have been committed from 1989 to 2000 because during that period price-fixing agreements and cartels were not illegal under English law, unless there were other aggravating… [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:26 am
Regina (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice Court of Appeal “Section 35 of the Criminal Justice Act 1991, giving the Secretary of State for Justice power to block the release on licence of prisoners sentenced between 1991 and 2003 to prison terms of more than 15 years, was not compatible with article 5.4 of the European Convention on Human Rights, providing that anyone deprived of his liberty had the right to have the lawfulness of his detention… [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 8:25 am by Kayla Campbell
 While Dowl argued for de novo review under United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 10:17 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF: Same v AM; Same v AN; Same v AE Court of Appeal “While as much information as possible, without imperilling national security, should be disclosed to a person subject to a control order, it was arguable that there was no irreducible minimum the nondisclosure of which would automatically make a trial unfair. [read post]