Search for: "Law v. Superior Court of State of Ariz."
Results 81 - 100
of 111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2016, 12:20 pm
In evaluating the possession challenge, the court noted that possession may be actual or constructive (State v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp., 65 P.3d 956, 965 n.3 (Ariz. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 11:09 pm
” The Arizona Court followed the lead of California in Howard v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 3:25 pm
That was the issue addressed in a recent Arizona Court of Appeals case, State v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 7:00 am
Wife then appealed the Board’s determination to the Superior Court, which affirmed the Board because ARS § 28-773(D) removed the former Wife as a beneficiary by operation of law. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
7 Apr 2018, 4:40 pm
(Ariz. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:57 am
The court held that substantial evidence supported the superior court’s and ADES’ conclusion of abuse. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Unless appellate courts come up with some grandfathering doctrine to exempt claims that would not have been time-barred before the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Agar Corp. v Electro Circuits. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 10:06 am
State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:22 am
Goodfarb, 880 P.2d 620, 179 Ariz. 400 (Ariz., 1994). [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 6:00 am
Gia Chapman v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
Superior Court, 778 P.2d 634, 637, 642 (Ariz. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:04 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
Arizona Board of Regents, 2008 WL 5047641 (Ariz. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 6:52 pm
Kerner, who practices in Northridge, filed the suit in the Los Angeles County Superior Court against Aetna Health Plans of California Inc., Aetna U.S. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am
I'm putting up some excerpts from my new draft article, The Law of Pseudonymous Litigation, hoping to get some feedback. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
Ariz. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 5:03 am
Langerman Law Offices, P.A., 24 P.3d 593 (Ariz. 2001) In this case, the Arizona Supreme Court broke new ground, holding that a cause of action for malpractice existed, even if the insurer was not a client per se. [read post]
