Search for: "Lawlor v. Lawlor" Results 1 - 20 of 68
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2009, 5:25 am
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Lawlor v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 11:50 am
Proving such a claim can be difficult for an employer, but if the employer is able to marshall evidence of improper pre-termination activity (often learned through a forensic examination of the ex-employee's computer), it may be able to put a halt to anti-competitive conduct and obtain significant monetary relief. -- Court: Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division (Transferred to Law) Opinion Date: N/A Cite: Lawlor v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 3:18 am by tracey
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Lawlor v Sandvik Mining & Construction Mobile Crushers and Screens Ltd [2012] EWHC 1188 (QB) (15 May 2012) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 12:00 am
On October 18, 2012, the Illinois Supreme Court delivered a very important decision for Illinois employers in Lawlor v. [read post]
On October 18, 2012, the Illinois Supreme Court delivered a very important decision for Illinois employers in Lawlor v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 10:23 am
Dean Patty Salkin's Law of the Land blog posts James Lawlor's summary of the Hawaii Supreme Court's decision in County of Hawaii v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 2:17 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Lamaletie Anor v R. [2008] EWCA Crim 314 (28 February 2008) Lawlor, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 474 (25 February 2008) Southwell, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 490 (25 February 2008) Taylor, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 465 (22 February 2008) Jarvis, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 488 (22 February 2008) SD, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 527 (18 February 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Tyco Fire & Integrated Solutions (UK)… [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 4:02 am
Were you not concerned about the Constitutionality of this legislation in light of Crawford v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 10:46 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 A 6-1 majority led by Justice Mary Jane Theis affirmed in part and reversed in part a judgment arising out of a complex employment dispute in Lawlor v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Peter Mahler
The case is called Verghetta v Lawlor, and you can read here Justice Scheinkman’s 33-page post-trial decision dated March 9, 2016, the opening paragraph of which aptly sets the stage for the fair-value drama that follows, starring dueling appraisals over two thousand percent apart: This Court is called upon to determine the value of two corporate entities for purposes of permitting the buy-out of a minority shareholder. [read post]