Search for: "Lawrence Feldman"
Results 61 - 80
of 170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2019, 2:36 pm
Early coverage comes from Adam Liptak of The New York Times; Robert Barnes of The Washington Post; David Savage of The Los Angeles Times; Lawrence Hurley of Reuters; Jessica Gresko of the AP; Greg Stohr of Bloomberg; Ariance de Vogue and Veronica Stracqualursi of CNN; and Antonia Blumberg and Marina Fang of HuffPost, Fang wrote separately about Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dissent. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 6:31 am
SAMTA and Lawrence v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 3:43 am
The plaintiffs alleged, among other things, that the defendants committed legal malpractice in their representation of the plaintiffs in a breach of contract action commenced by the plaintiffs against a nonparty medical billing services provider (hereinafter the underlying action) and, with respect to the plaintiff Lawrence F. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 5:57 am
Steinman, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Friday, November 12, 2021 Tags: Antitrust, Appraisal rights, Delaware cases, Delaware law, FTC, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Private equity, Securities litigation, Termination Optimizing The World’s Leading Corporate Law: A 20-Year Retrospective and Look Ahead Posted by Lawrence A. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 4:42 am
” In The Inquirer, Frederick Lawrence contends that the “categorical obstruction of the Garland nomination has created challenges for the court. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 2:28 pm
Commentary on potential nominees comes from Lawrence Hurley of Reuters and Bill Mears at Fox News. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:36 pm
Drucker at the Washington Examiner, Jonathan Cohn and Jeffrey Young at Huffington Post, Devin Montgomery at Jurist, Sam Baker at National Journal, Sarah Kliff at Vox, and Krishnadev Calamur at NPR, Commentary comes from Noah Feldman, Megan McArdle, and Cass R. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:03 am
Additional coverage comes from Lawrence Hurley and Andrew Chung at Reuters. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 6:51 am
” In The Atlantic, Lawrence Norden discusses the Court and its campaign finance cases, concluding that “it is no exaggeration to say that the next appointments to the Supreme Court will have a profound impact on political power in the United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 9:30 pm
Board member Lawrence Feldman, who had previously supported Tischenkel was absent. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 4:48 am
” At Reuters, Lawrence Hurley reports that the “[s]horthanded and ideologically divided” Court “has yet to take up any cases on politically sensitive social issues in its new term starting in October, instead showing a keen interest in more technical cases of importance to business such as disputes over intellectual property. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 2:09 pm
Adler of The Volokh Conspiracy, German Lopez of Vox, Steve Klepper at the Maryland Appellate Blog, Ed Mannino at his eponymous blog, Rick Hasen at his Election Law Blog, and Noah Feldman for Bloomberg View. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 3:27 pm
(The Globe also notes than an offer is out to Stanford’s Lawrence Lessig. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 7:16 am
Lawrence Hurley of NBC News has the details: Back in 1923, the Supreme Court had issued 157 rulings by May 1 in a term that started the previous fall. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 4:33 am
” At Reuters, Lawrence Hurley reports that if “Democrats thought it was hard to stop President Donald Trump’s first U.S. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 5:48 am
Feldman), and attorney ethics (The Ethics of Existing on the Web presented by Dan Giancaterino). [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:50 pm
" Lawrence Hurley and John Whitesides of Reuters report that "Trump calls on U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am
” Commentary comes from Rick Hasen in an op-ed for The Los Angeles Times and Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:15 am
Lyle Denniston covered the ruling for this blog, with other coverage coming from NPR’s Nina Totenberg, Lawrence Hurley of Reuters, Adam Liptak and Mary Walsh of The New York Times, and Lydia Wheeler of The Hill. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:58 am
Bob Egelko of the San Francisco Chronicle suggests that, although the Court was not prepared to consider the question of same-sex marriage in 2003, when it decided Lawrence v. [read post]
