Search for: "Lawrence v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 3,339
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2012, 12:27 am by Graeme Hall
The Secretary of State for Justice v RB & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1608 (20 December…. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:55 pm by Andrew Hamm
This morning the Court heard oral argument in Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm by Andrew Hamm
This morning the Court announced its decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 12:44 pm by jewatson
Lawrence’s Lady Chatterly’s Lover* to the United States. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 7:45 am by Guest Blogger
Wade and the 10th of the ruling in Lawrence v. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 9:15 pm
Elizabeth Wu & Lawrence Boo, Of Moving Frontiers and Notes Verbales: Ascertaining the Intentions of State Parties in BITs (Sanum Investments Ltd v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 3:47 am by John Kang
From the Advocate: The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals has ruled that the state’s antisodomy law is unconstitutional – 11 years after the U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:16 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Kear, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 2663 (04 November 2011) Lawrence, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 2609 (03 November 2011) Attorney General’s Reference Nos 61, 62 AND 63 of 2011 [2011] EWCA Crim 2619 (27 October 2011) Abdzahra, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 2664 (04 November 2011) Bashir, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 2763 (03 November 2011) Ciccarelli, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 2665 (03 November 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil… [read post]
15 May 2007, 9:00 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Lawrence v Pembrokeshire County Council [2007] EWCA Civ 446 (15 May 2007) Smith v Smith [2007] EWCA Civ 454 (15 May 2007) Intel Corporation Intel Corporation Inc v CPM United Kingdom Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 431 (15 May 2007) Barclays Bank Plc & Anor v HM Revenue & Customs [2007] EWCA Civ 442 (11 May 2007) Eastaway v Secretary of State for Trade & Industry [2007] EWCA Civ 425 (10… [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:43 am by John Elwood
  The odds are good that we’re about to get one more, in a capital case out of the Eleventh Circuit, Lawrence Joseph Jefferson v. [read post]