Search for: "Lawson v. Attorney General " Results 1 - 20 of 129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2019, 2:53 pm by H. Scott Leviant
The question under review is whether a representative action under the Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (Lab. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 5:50 pm by Samuel Bray
Steve Calabresi, Elise Kostiel, and Gary Lawson have a new paper called "What McCulloch v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 1:39 pm
Superior Court of San Diego County (Lawson),1 the California Supreme Court held that unpaid wages are not civil penalties under California Labor Code section 558 and are therefore outside the reach of California’s Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 10:42 am by Timothy P. Flynn
"Contrary to the state's assertions that the ban was merely designed to save money, Judge Lawson saw an animus against gays; a punishment of same-sex couples.Considering that the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed Judge Friedman's DeBoer decision supporting same-sex couples, an appeal filed by the Michigan Attorney General would seem inevitable; the deadline recently passed so we will be checking PACER.These issues will continue to play out in… [read post]
   The case concerned an action brought under the Private Attorneys General Act, wherein the representative employee was seeking, among other things, lost wages under Labor Code Section 558. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:45 pm by Jason L. Odom
The Supreme Court ruled on March 5, 2014 in the case of Lawson v. [read post]