Search for: "Lawyer v. Valdez" Results 1 - 20 of 82
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2008, 6:04 pm
Supreme Court's decision not to decide whether the plaintiffs in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 9:02 am
The WSJ's Law Blog reported recently on the joy being experienced by lawyers in the firms representing plaintiffs in the Exxon Valdez case, their spirits dampened only mildly by the Ninth Circuit's recent reduction in the punitive award from $4.5 billion to $2.5 billion. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 7:46 pm
Lawyers for a class of fisherman and other Alaskans affected by the Exxon Valdez oil spill submitted what is likely their last request earlier today for the Court to award some $488 million in interest on the punitive damage award authorized in the recent decision in Exxon v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 5:41 pm
Lawyers for the class of fishermen and other individuals affected by the Exxon Valdez oil spill have asked the Court to make clear that they remain entitled to interest on the punitive damage award that now stands at roughly $500 million following the Court’s decision in Exxon v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 7:11 pm
Responding to a submission filed last week, lawyers for Exxon today asked the Court to declare that the recent decision in Exxon v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 6:15 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The purpose of the requirement of an insurable interest is to discourage the use of insurance for illegitimate purposes as discussed in the 1999, Austin Court of Appeals opinion, Valdez v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 1:35 pm
Indianapolis, Indiana - An intellectual property attorney for G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC ("G & G") of Campbell, California initiated a lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Elsa Valdez and Tikal #2, Inc., both of Indianapolis, Indiana, illegally intercepted and broadcast the Saul Alvarez v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 4:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Of this alleged scheme between Sidley and Valdez, plaintiffs allege that, unknown to them, but known to Sidley lawyers, the Opinion Letter could not support the supposed tax treatment represented, including in particular the claimed basis in Euros purportedly held by Kislev and sold to plaintiffs. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 4:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Of this alleged scheme between Sidley and Valdez, plaintiffs allege that, unknown to them, but known to Sidley lawyers, the Opinion Letter could not support the supposed tax treatment represented, including in particular the claimed basis in Euros purportedly held by Kislev and sold to plaintiffs. [read post]