Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 101 - 120
of 8,510
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2014, 7:35 am
Corp., et al. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:25 pm
Forbidden Warrior.Forbidden expert.Bad films make good law.United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:48 pm
The post “A Fifth Circuit immigration order lays bare a conservative divide on the appeals court; It’s ‘mad vibes’ judges v. legal conservatives in a sign of just how far right the federal appeals court has gone that covers Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 2:47 am
Regina v Dunn [2010] EWCA Crim 1823; [2010] WLR (D) 207 “The fact that an appeal from the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division only lay to the Supreme Court if the Court of Appeal certified that a point of law of general public importance was involved in its decision did not amount to a denial of the essence of an appellant’s right of access to the Supreme Court and was not incompatible with articles 6 and 14 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and… [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 1:55 am
Regina v Charles Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Where a person was charged with an offence of doing something which he was prohibited from doing by an antisocial behaviour order without reasonable excuse, the legal burden of proving that the defendant acted without reasonable excuse lay on the prosecution. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 6:14 am
The post DOUGLAS CAISHPAL REIMUNDO v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 8:26 am
The "new" housing strategy published today, Laying the Foundations: A Housing Strategy for England, has some interesting bits to it, but it is somewhat unfortunate that the government has taken the opportunity to trumpet its achievements and pronounce their success in this document without proper, close evaluation. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 8:26 am
The "new" housing strategy published today, Laying the Foundations: A Housing Strategy for England, has some interesting bits to it, but it is somewhat unfortunate that the government has taken the opportunity to trumpet its achievements and pronounce their success in this document without proper, close evaluation. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 5:12 am
Last week, in Bell v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 6:47 am
The Second Circuit is now suggesting that the Carlin case, FCC v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 1:11 pm
Lay-Com, Inc. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 10:48 am
T Mobile (UK) Ltd and another v Office of Communications [2008] EWCA Civ 1373; [2008] WLR (D) 391 “A challenge to a the decision of the Office of Communications (’Ofcom’) concerning the award of wireless telegraphy licences lay by way of a claim for judicial review and not an appeal to the Competition Appeal Tribunal (’CAT’). [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:29 am
Koster v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 9:48 pm
After nearly three years of discovery, the parties in the massive Viacom v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 6:14 am
Supreme Court decided in TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 4:18 am
Nor do plaintiffs concerns with respect to his bankruptcy proceeding provide a reasonable excuse for that failure (see Pipinias v J. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 8:11 am
This decision does not however appear to have been applied or followed by the Courts thereafter, and in fact was expressly rejected in the more 2016 case of Michalski v Cima Canada Inc.] [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 7:24 pm
In Stone v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 2:41 pm
The temporal scope of the desk audit phase of an OFCCP compliance review can be extended beyond the date that the contractor received its audit scheduling letter, ruled the Labor Department’s Administrative Review Board (ARB), reversing an 2010 ruling by an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) in favor of federal contractor Frito-Lay, Inc (OFCCP v Frito-Lay, Inc, ARB Case No 2010, May 8, 2010). [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 3:00 am
Standard Fire at Use in Practice in Arkansas Deaton v. [read post]
