Search for: "Le v. Bird"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2017, 9:12 pm
Philippe Achilleas (Université Paris Sud - Law) & Willy Mikalef (Bird & Bird) have published TIC Innovation et droit international : Technologie de l'information et de la communication (Pedone 2017). [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Collateral Challenge, Legislative Intent and Public Law Remedies in R v Bird 2019 SCC 7 Found to be a long-term offender and known to be someone who struggled with conditional releases from custody, Mr Bird was made subject by the Parole Board of Canada to a long-term supervision order, which included a residency requirement. [read post]
9 May 2018, 8:34 am
Panama| Will trade mark law stop Marine Le Pen's new campaign? [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 3:46 am
AIPPI UK is delighted to welcome at very short notice two speakers, Christian Harmsen (Bird & Bird, Germany) and Jemima Stratford QC (Brick Court Chambers), who will provide a fascinating insight into the recent decision of the CJEU in Huawei v ZTE which considered the circumstances in which injunctive relief could be awarded in patent disputes involving standards essential patents (SEPs). [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:56 am
Wouter Pors (Bird & Bird, The Hague), not entirely agreeing with the motion, posted his reply here. [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 8:30 am
Richard Vary of Bird & Bird summarises the take home messages from the Shenzhen Intermediate court's written judgments in two standard-essential patent (SEP) infringement cases, filed by Huawei against Samsung. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
| OHIM’s rebranding | LV’s pattern as trade mark | EPO and trade unions | Patent and first-mover advantage | Libraries’ right to digitise their collection in Germany.Never too late 42 [week ending on Sunday 19 April] – WIPO Roving Seminars in Israel | Foster v Svenson, or "of taking pictures of your neighbours" | Trade marks and social networks | Jan Rosen on CJEU's public criterion to assess whether linking amounts… [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
Barnes v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 11:25 am
Flipping the proverbial bird is a God-given, Charter enshrined right that belongs to every red-blooded Canadian. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 3:12 pm
Testigo: Ika Ogunda2do Testigo: Osa KuleyaOración Profética: Osorbo Iku Intori Ogu.Orula Onire: Adimu (Un ñame, un coco partido en 2 mitades, todo se embarra con manteca de corojo, su coco y sus velas.Otan Onishe Ara: Sarayeye con un pollo y se le da a Oggun, con los demás ingredientes y darse un baño con hierbas de Paraldo.Otan Deidad que Gobierna: OshúnDeidad Acompañante: Oggun OtanBandera: Amarilla con Ribetes verdesEbbo: 1 chivo (para… [read post]
18 May 2009, 1:48 am
BRAZELL, Solicitor - Advocate, Cabinet Bird & Bird 4. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:27 pm
If the client merely provided the tattoo artist with a few general instructions – for example, “please draw me a red bird”, and the tattoo artist in turn proceeded to make an unauthorized copy of someone else’s work, it could be easier to demonstrate that no illegal “authorization” on the part of the client took place. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:27 pm
If the client merely provided the tattoo artist with a few general instructions – for example, “please draw me a red bird”, and the tattoo artist in turn proceeded to make an unauthorized copy of someone else’s work, it could be easier to demonstrate that no illegal “authorization” on the part of the client took place. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 8:57 pm
Big v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
Supreme Court dismisses appeal in Servier v Apotex. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 2:20 am
: Daiichi Sankyo Co Ltd v Comptroller General of Patents (The SPC Blog) Coversyl (Perindopril) – Australia: FCAFC: Servier denied patent amendment on appeal: Les Laboratoires Servier v Apotex (Patentology) Prandin (Repaglinide) – US: Paddock fails to dismiss Novo’s Prandin patent suit (Patent Docs) Spiriva (Tiotropium bromide monohydrate) – Israel: Patent status in question, in need of legislative fix (America-Israel Patent Law) Temodar… [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:58 pm
The first decision (Google & Aufeminin.com v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:58 pm
The first decision (Google & Aufeminin.com v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Bird and Lucille M. [read post]
