Search for: "Leader Technologies Inc. v. Facebook Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2012, 7:00 am by ACC Guest Blogger
Technology leaders like Google, Facebook and Apple often field dedicated integration teams for launches and acquisitions because the pace of technological competition reduces the margin for error during transition. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 7:00 am by ACC Guest Blogger
Technology leaders like Google, Facebook and Apple often field dedicated integration teams for launches and acquisitions because the pace of technological competition reduces the margin for error during transition. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
” Canada The Supreme Court handed down judgment in the controversial case of Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34) dismissing (7:2) Google’s appeal against a worldwide injunction ordering it to remove websites from search results. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by INFORRM
The defendant was alleged to have defamed the plaintiff in a Facebook post that suggested he scammed his customers. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Facebook blamed technical issues, and apologised. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 5:01 am by Hilary Hurd
Most famously, in Capital Cities/ABC, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:28 pm
(Content Agenda) MPAA effectively shuts down largest fan edit movie site (Techdirt) Final judgment: SCO owes Novell millions (plus interest) (Ars Technica) Coupons, Inc drops DMCA lawsuit against coupon hacker (Ars Technica) (Techdirt) McCain responds to Jackson Browne lawsuit (Techdirt) Judge quashes subpoenas where Boston University could not identify John Does ‘to reasonable degree of technical certainty: London Sire Records v Does 1-4 (Recording Industry vs The… [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:10 am
” The motion cites the 2001 California Supreme Court Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:54 am by Hannah Kris
Several technology companies, including Facebook, Apple, and Google, had filed a brief supporting neither party but encouraging the Supreme Court to support the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
 The claim against the first defendant, Google Inc, continues. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
AG Kokott provides some indications | Pepper gets spicy: The EPO President's Referral to the EBA | Book review: Accords de technologie / Technology Transactions | More Than Just a Game V - IP and the gaming industry | Event report: Retromark – the conference | Re-imagining Marie Louise Fuller's copyright of dance in Fuller v Bemis | Conference report: 'Injunctions and flexibility in patent law' | DSM Directive Series #3: How far does Article 14… [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:22 am
Feb. 23, 2009). http://tinyurl.com/24fbolj Independent Newspapers, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On 26 October 2015, Warby J heard the appeals in the cases of Richardson v Facebook and Richardson v Google UK Ltd. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 4:00 am
Justice Michel Bastarache, of the Supreme Court of Canada, criticized that court for the 2004 decisions in the Monsanto Canada Inc. v. [read post]